Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25303364›Full record

ArticleeLife2014

Irreversible fate commitment in the Arabidopsis stomatal lineage requires a FAMA and RETINOBLASTOMA-RELATED module.

Juliana L Matos, On Sun Lau, Charles Hachez, Alfredo Cruz-Ramírez, Ben Scheres, Dominique C Bergmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cell cycle in plant development and reprogramming.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Stomatal development in the changing climate.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  14. What Is a Plant Cell Type in the Age of Single-Cell Biology? It's Complicated.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Juliana L MatosDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9347-304X
On Sun LauDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8121-235X
Charles HachezDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Alfredo Cruz-RamírezDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Ben ScheresDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Dominique C BergmannDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Stanford University · USUtrecht University · NLHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Control of epidermal self-renewing populations by bHLH and MAPK regulatory systemR01GM086632 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BERGMANN, DOMINIQUE C · 2009 to 2015
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM086632NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presumed totipotency of plant cells leads to questions about how specific stem cell lineages and terminal fates could be established. In the Arabidopsis stomatal lineage, a transient self-renewing phase creates precursors that differentiate into one of two epidermal cell types, guard cells or pavement cells. We found that irreversible differentiation of guard cells involves RETINOBLASTOMA-RELATED (RBR) recruitment to regulatory regions of master regulators of stomatal initiation, facilitated through interaction with a terminal stomatal lineage transcription factor, FAMA. Disrupting physical interactions between FAMA and RBR preferentially reveals the role of RBR in enforcing fate commitment over its role in cell-cycle control in this developmental context. Analysis of the phenotypes linked to the modulation of FAMA and RBR sheds new light on the way iterative divisions and terminal differentiation are coordinately regulated in a plant stem-cell lineage.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantAmino Acid SequenceArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell CycleCell DifferentiationCell LineageGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMolecular Sequence DataPlant StomataProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiarySequence AlignmentArabidopsis ProteinsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsFAMA protein, ArabidopsisRBR1 protein, ArabidopsisarabidopsisbHLH transcription factordifferentiationplant biologyretinoblastomastomata

Identifiers

PMID25303364
PMCPMC4225492
OpenAlexW2171192876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.