Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25303102›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Characterization and compensation of network-level anomalies in mixed-signal neuromorphic modeling platforms.

Mihai A Petrovici, Bernhard Vogginger, Paul Müller, Oliver Breitwieser, Mikael Lundqvist, Lyle Muller, Matthias Ehrlich, Alain Destexhe, Anders Lansner, René Schüffny and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mihai A PetroviciRuprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bernhard VoggingerTechnische Universität Dresden, Institute of Circuits and Systems, Dresden, Germany.
Paul MüllerRuprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.
Oliver BreitwieserRuprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.
Mikael LundqvistDepartment of Computational Biology, School of Computer Science and Communication, Stockholm University and Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lyle MullerCNRS, Unité de Neuroscience, Information et Complexité, Gif sur Yvette, France.
Matthias EhrlichTechnische Universität Dresden, Institute of Circuits and Systems, Dresden, Germany.
Alain DestexheCNRS, Unité de Neuroscience, Information et Complexité, Gif sur Yvette, France.
Anders LansnerDepartment of Computational Biology, School of Computer Science and Communication, Stockholm University and Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
René SchüffnyTechnische Universität Dresden, Institute of Circuits and Systems, Dresden, Germany.
Johannes SchemmelRuprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.
Karlheinz MeierRuprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Kirchhoff Institute for Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancing the size and complexity of neural network models leads to an ever increasing demand for computational resources for their simulation. Neuromorphic devices offer a number of advantages over conventional computing architectures, such as high emulation speed or low power consumption, but this usually comes at the price of reduced configurability and precision. In this article, we investigate the consequences of several such factors that are common to neuromorphic devices, more specifically limited hardware resources, limited parameter configurability and parameter variations due to fixed-pattern noise and trial-to-trial variability. Our final aim is to provide an array of methods for coping with such inevitable distortion mechanisms. As a platform for testing our proposed strategies, we use an executable system specification (ESS) of the BrainScaleS neuromorphic system, which has been designed as a universal emulation back-end for neuroscientific modeling. We address the most essential limitations of this device in detail and study their effects on three prototypical benchmark network models within a well-defined, systematic workflow. For each network model, we start by defining quantifiable functionality measures by which we then assess the effects of typical hardware-specific distortion mechanisms, both in idealized software simulations and on the ESS. For those effects that cause unacceptable deviations from the original network dynamics, we suggest generic compensation mechanisms and demonstrate their effectiveness. Both the suggested workflow and the investigated compensation mechanisms are largely back-end independent and do not require additional hardware configurability beyond the one required to emulate the benchmark networks in the first place. We hereby provide a generic methodological environment for configurable neuromorphic devices that are targeted at emulating large-scale, functional neural networks.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationComputer SystemsNeural Networks, ComputerComputersEquipment DesignModels, NeurologicalNeuronsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID25303102
PMCPMC4193761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.