Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25302955›Full record

ReviewFuture microbiology2014

Biofilms in periprosthetic orthopedic infections.

Stephen J McConoughey, Rob Howlin, Jeff F Granger, Maurice M Manring, Jason H Calhoun, Mark Shirtliff, Sandeep Kathju, Paul Stoodley

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03976466 (Application of Antibiotic Loaded Calcium Sulfate as Prophylaxis for Patients With Non Modifiable Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 170 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03976466 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Application of Antibiotic Loaded Calcium Sulfate as Prophylaxis for Patients With Non Modifiable Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infections

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Regional TlalnepantlaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled87ConditionsInfectionArmsAntibiotic local prophylaxis with medicated calcium sulfate beads, Classical parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Disinfection of contaminated metal implants with an Er:YAG laser.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2020
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. In Vitro Antibiofilm and Antibacterial Properties of Rue (International journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. In Vitro Antibacterial Efficacy of a New TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephen J McConougheyDepartment of Orthopedics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Rob Howlin
Jeff F Granger
Maurice M Manring
Jason H Calhoun
Mark Shirtliff
Sandeep Kathju
Paul Stoodley

Funding

Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: in vitro and in vivo studiesR01AI069568 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SHIRTLIFF, MARK E · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the number of total joint arthroplasty and internal fixation procedures continues to rise, the threat of infection following surgery has significant clinical implications. These infections may have highly morbid consequences to patients, who often endure additional surgeries and lengthy exposures to systemic antibiotics, neither of which are guaranteed to resolve the infection. Of particular concern is the threat of bacterial biofilm development, since biofilm-mediated infections are difficult to diagnose and effective treatments are lacking. Developing therapeutic strategies have targeted mechanisms of biofilm formation and the means by which these bacteria communicate with each other to take on specialized roles such as persister cells within the biofilm. In addition, prevention of infection through novel coatings for prostheses and the local delivery of high concentrations of antibiotics by absorbable carriers has shown promise in laboratory and animal studies. Biofilm development, especially in an arthoplasty environment, and future diagnostic and treatment options are discussed.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, ReplacementAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaBacterial AdhesionBiofilmsHumansProsthesis-Related InfectionsAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotic resistancearthroplastybiofilmcoatinginfectionplanktonicprosthesistreatment

Identifiers

PMID25302955
PMCPMC4407677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.