Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25302772›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American College of Nutrition2014

Typical prenatal vitamin D supplement intake does not prevent decrease of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D at birth.

Marlies K Ozias, Elizabeth H Kerling, Danielle N Christifano, Susan A Scholtz, John Colombo, Susan E Carlson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00266825 (Kansas University DHA Outcome Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00266825 phase3completednot on this map

Kansas University DHA Outcome Study (KUDOS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSusan Carlson, PhDRan2006 to 2011Enrolled350ConditionsPregnancyArmsDHA, Placebo capsule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marlies K Oziasa Department of Dietetics and Nutrition , University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City , Kansas.
Elizabeth H Kerling
Danielle N Christifano
Susan A Scholtz
John Colombo
Susan E Carlson

Funding

Participant Recruitment and ManagementP30DC005803 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI RICE, MABEL L · 2002 to 2016
$5.8M
DHA Supplementation and Pregnancy OutcomeR01HD047315 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI CARLSON, SUSAN E, COLOMBO, JOHN A. · 2006 to 2016
$4.9M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD047315NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC005803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this longitudinal study was to determine what typical vitamin D predictors influence the change in vitamin D status from mid-pregnancy to birth.

methodsPlasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] was determined at mid-pregnancy (8-20 weeks gestation) and following birth (n = 193). Usual predictors of vitamin D status [body mass index (BMI), race, season] in addition to prenatal supplemental vitamin D intake and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) status at delivery were assessed for their interaction on the change on plasma 25(OH)D concentration between the two time points.

resultsForty-nine percent of women had inadequate vitamin D status [categorized as deficient (<30 nmol/L) or insufficient (30-49.9 nmol/L) by IOM guidelines] at mid-pregnancy and 82% were deficient or insufficient at birth. Plasma 25(OH)D concentration dropped 61% from mid-pregnancy to birth. Season of birth (F = 7.86, P = 0.006) and mid-pregnancy plasma 25(OH)D concentration (F = 6.17, P = 0.014) were significant variables in the change of vitamin D status while BMI, race, DHA status, and typical vitamin D intake (334 IU/day) from prenatal supplements did not have an effect. Women who delivered in summer and fall had a 1.5-fold greater plasma 25(OH)D concentration than women who delivered in winter in spring (41.1 ± 23.1 and 40.7 ± 20.5 nmol/L summer and fall, respectively, versus 27.7 ± 17.9 and 29.3 ± 21.4 nmol/L in winter and spring, respectively).

conclusionsTypical supplemental vitamin D intake during pregnancy did not prevent precipitous drops in maternal plasma 25(OH)D concentration. Clinicians and dietitians should be aware of the risk of inadequate vitamin D status in pregnant women in the United States relative to their initial vitamin D status and the season of birth.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsPrenatal CareAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrevalenceSeasonsSunlightVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyYoung Adult25-hydroxyvitamin DVitamin Dinsufficiencypregnancyseasonsupplements and functional foodsvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID25302772
PMCPMC4224609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.