Trial reportJournal of the American College of Nutrition2014
Typical prenatal vitamin D supplement intake does not prevent decrease of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D at birth.
Trial report in Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00266825 (Kansas University DHA Outcome Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Kansas University DHA Outcome Study (KUDOS)
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Working group reports: evaluation of the evidence to support practice guidelines for nutritional care of preterm infants-the Pre-B Project.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2016Pooled it
- Trial
- Effect of early and late prenatal vitamin D and maternal asthma status on offspring asthma or recurrent wheeze.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2021Trial
- Article
- Racial and ethnic differences in predictors of vitamin D among pregnant women in south-eastern USA.Journal of nutritional science · 2019Article
- Maternal Vitamin D Status and Infant Infection.Nutrients · 2018Article
- Cord blood vitamin D status and neonatal outcomes in a birth cohort in Quebec, Canada.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2016Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this longitudinal study was to determine what typical vitamin D predictors influence the change in vitamin D status from mid-pregnancy to birth.
methodsPlasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] was determined at mid-pregnancy (8-20 weeks gestation) and following birth (n = 193). Usual predictors of vitamin D status [body mass index (BMI), race, season] in addition to prenatal supplemental vitamin D intake and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) status at delivery were assessed for their interaction on the change on plasma 25(OH)D concentration between the two time points.
resultsForty-nine percent of women had inadequate vitamin D status [categorized as deficient (<30 nmol/L) or insufficient (30-49.9 nmol/L) by IOM guidelines] at mid-pregnancy and 82% were deficient or insufficient at birth. Plasma 25(OH)D concentration dropped 61% from mid-pregnancy to birth. Season of birth (F = 7.86, P = 0.006) and mid-pregnancy plasma 25(OH)D concentration (F = 6.17, P = 0.014) were significant variables in the change of vitamin D status while BMI, race, DHA status, and typical vitamin D intake (334 IU/day) from prenatal supplements did not have an effect. Women who delivered in summer and fall had a 1.5-fold greater plasma 25(OH)D concentration than women who delivered in winter in spring (41.1 ± 23.1 and 40.7 ± 20.5 nmol/L summer and fall, respectively, versus 27.7 ± 17.9 and 29.3 ± 21.4 nmol/L in winter and spring, respectively).
conclusionsTypical supplemental vitamin D intake during pregnancy did not prevent precipitous drops in maternal plasma 25(OH)D concentration. Clinicians and dietitians should be aware of the risk of inadequate vitamin D status in pregnant women in the United States relative to their initial vitamin D status and the season of birth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.