Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25302767›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2014

Role of anisotropic interactions for proteins and patchy nanoparticles.

Christopher J Roberts, Marco A Blanco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Self-association of a highly charged arginine-rich cell-penetrating peptide.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher J RobertsDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, and Center for Molecular and Engineering Thermodynamics, University of Delaware , Newark, Delaware 19716, United States.
Marco A Blanco

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions are inherently anisotropic to some degree, with orientation-dependent interactions between repulsive and attractive or complementary regions or "patches" on adjacent proteins. In some cases it has been suggested that such patch-patch interactions dominate the thermodynamics of dilute protein solutions, as captured by the osmotic second virial coefficient (B22), but delineating when this will or will not be the case remains an open question. A series of simplified but exactly solvable models are first used to illustrate that a delicate balance exists between the strength of attractive patch-patch interactions and the patch size, and that repulsive patch-patch interactions contribute significantly to B22 for only those conditions where the repulsions are long-ranged. Finally, B22 is reformulated, without approximations, in terms of the density of states for a given interaction energy and particle-particle distance. Doing so illustrates the inherent balance of entropic and energetic contributions to B22. It highlights that simply having strong patch-patch interactions will only cause anisotropic interactions to dominate B22 solution properties if the unavoidable entropic penalties are overcome, which cannot occur if patches are too small. The results also indicate that the temperature dependence of B22 may be a simple experimental means to assess whether a small number of strongly attractive configurations dominate the dilute solution behavior.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalAnisotropyKineticsNanoparticlesProtein BindingProteinsStatic ElectricityThermodynamicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID25302767
PMCPMC4226310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.