Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25302712›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Fractal analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Markus Fabrizii, Farid Moinfar, Herbert F Jelinek, Audrey Karperien, Helmut Ahammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Methylation-mediated silencing ofFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Markus FabriziiInstitute of Biophysics, Centre for Physiological Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Farid MoinfarUnit of Breast and Gynaecologic Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Department of Pathology, Hospital of the Sisters of Charity, Linz, Austria.
Herbert F JelinekCentre for Research in Complex Systems, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Australia; School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Australia.
Audrey KarperienSchool of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Albury, Australia.
Helmut AhammerInstitute of Biophysics, Centre for Physiological Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) represent precursor lesions of cervical cancer. These neoplastic lesions are traditionally subdivided into three categories CIN 1, CIN 2, and CIN 3, using microscopical criteria. The relation between grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and its fractal dimension was investigated to establish a basis for an objective diagnosis using the method proposed.

methodsClassical evaluation of the tissue samples was performed by an experienced gynecologic pathologist. Tissue samples were scanned and saved as digital images using Aperio scanner and software. After image segmentation the box counting method as well as multifractal methods were applied to determine the relation between fractal dimension and grades of CIN. A total of 46 images were used to compare the pathologist's neoplasia grades with the predicted groups obtained by fractal methods.

resultsSignificant or highly significant differences between all grades of CIN could be found. The confusion matrix, comparing between pathologist's grading and predicted group by fractal methods showed a match of 87.1%. Multifractal spectra were able to differentiate between normal epithelium and low grade as well as high grade neoplasia.

conclusionFractal dimension can be considered to be an objective parameter to grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Indexed as

FractalsCervix UteriFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25302712
PMCPMC4193757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.