Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25302600›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Reliable in silico identification of sequence polymorphisms and their application for extending the genetic map of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris).

Daniela Holtgräwe, Thomas Rosleff Sörensen, Prisca Viehöver, Jessica Schneider, Britta Schulz, Dietrich Borchardt, Thomas Kraft, Heinz Himmelbauer, Bernd Weisshaar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The effect of heat stress on sugar beet recombination.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Article
  6. Genomes of the wild beets Beta patula and Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniela HoltgräweCeBiTec & Department of Biology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Thomas Rosleff SörensenCeBiTec & Department of Biology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Prisca ViehöverCeBiTec & Department of Biology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Jessica SchneiderCeBiTec & Department of Biology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Britta SchulzMolecular Breeding Sugarbeet, KWS Saat AG, Einbeck, Germany.
Dietrich BorchardtMolecular Breeding Sugarbeet, KWS Saat AG, Einbeck, Germany.
Thomas KraftSyngenta Seeds AB, Landskrona, Sweden.
Heinz HimmelbauerMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, Germany; Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona, Spain.
Bernd WeisshaarCeBiTec & Department of Biology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany.
Bielefeld University · DEKWS Saat (Germany) · DEMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular markers are a highly valuable tool for creating genetic maps. Like in many other crops, sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) breeding is increasingly supported by the application of such genetic markers. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) based markers have a high potential for automated analysis and high-throughput genotyping. We developed a bioinformatics workflow that uses Sanger and 2nd-generation sequence data for detection, evaluation and verification of new transcript-associated SNPs from sugar beet. RNAseq data from one parent of an established mapping population were produced by 454-FLX sequencing and compared to Sanger ESTs derived from the other parent. The workflow established for SNP detection considers the quality values of both types of reads, provides polymorphic alignments as well as selection criteria for reliable SNP detection and allows painless generation of new genetic markers within genes. We obtained a total of 14,323 genic SNPs and InDels. According to empirically optimised settings for the quality parameters, we classified these SNPs into four usability categories. Validation of a subset of the in silico detected SNPs by genotyping the mapping population indicated a high success rate of the SNP detection. Finally, a total of 307 new markers were integrated with existing data into a new genetic map of sugar beet which offers improved resolution and the integration of terminal markers.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticBeta vulgarisChromosome MappingComputational BiologyEvolution, MolecularExpressed Sequence TagsGenetic LociGenetic MarkersGenome, PlantGenomicsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNAGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID25302600
PMCPMC4193868
OpenAlexW1966608666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.