Trial reportPloS one2014
Ability of nafamostat mesilate to prolong filter patency during continuous renal replacement therapy in patients at high risk of bleeding: a randomized controlled study.
Trial report in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01761994 (The Effect of Nafamostat Mesilate in Prolonging Filter Patency With Patients on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Nafamostat Mesilate in Prolonging Filter Patency With Patients on Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesylate versus heparin anticoagulation in adult kidney disease patients using continuous renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Nafamostat mesilate as anticoagulant for blood purification: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Anticoagulation options for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesilate anticoagulation in blood purification treatment of critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Renal failure · 2022Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Pharmacological interventions for preventing clotting of extracorporeal circuits during continuous renal replacement therapy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- The Japanese clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury 2016.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2018Guideline
- Comparison of the cytokine adsorption ability in continuous renal replacement therapy using polyethyleneimine-coated polyacrylonitrile (AN69ST) or polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) hemofilters: a pilot single-center open-label randomized control trial.European journal of medical research · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Clinical practice guideline for renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (2026 edition).Journal of intensive medicine · 2026Article
- Nafamostat mesylate versus low-molecular-weight heparin during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically Ill adults: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Regulated cell death-induced coagulation dysfunction in sepsis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Review
- Comparative efficacy and safety of anticoagulation strategies in continuous renal replacement therapy: a real-world cohort study.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Korean Society of Nephrology 2025 Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline for Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy.Electrolyte & blood pressure : E & BP · 2026Review
- Korean Society of Nephrology 2025 evidence-based clinical practice guideline for continuous kidney replacement therapy.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of nafamostat mesilate for anticoagulation during ECMO/CRRT: insight from the integrated meta-analysis and FAERS pharmacovigilance study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Renal replacement therapy in intensive care unit: a narrative review.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Safety and effectiveness of nafamostat mesylate in continuous renal replacement therapy in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a prospective randomized controlled trial.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Dose response of nafamostat mesylate for anticoagulation monitoring in pediatric critical care during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledContinuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is considered as an effective modality for renal replacement therapy in hemodynamically unstable patients within intensive care units (ICUs). However, the role of heparin anticoagulation, which is used to maintain circuit patency, is equivocal due to the risk of bleeding and morbidity. Among various alternative anticoagulants, nafamostat mesilate has been shown to be an effective anticoagulant in patients prone to bleeding. Hence, we conducted a prospective, randomized controlled study investigating the effect of nafamostat mesilate on mortality, CRRT filter life span and adverse events in patients with bleeding tendency. Seventy-three Patients were randomized into either the futhan or no-anticoagulation group. Thirty-six subjects in the futhan group received nafamostat mesilate, while thirty seven subjects in the no-anticoagulation group received no anticoagulants. Baseline characteristics and appropriate laboratory tests were taken from each group. The mortality between the two groups was not significantly different. Nevertheless, between the futhan group and the no-anticoagulation group, the overall number of filters used during CRRT (2.71 ± 2.12 vs. 4.50 ± 3.25; p = 0.042) and the number of filters changed due to clots per 24 hours (1.15 ± 0.81 vs. 1.74 ± 1.62; p = 0.040) were significantly different. When filter life span was subdivided into below and over 12 hours, the number of filters functioning over 12 hours was significantly higher in the futhan group than in the no-anticoagulation group (p = 0.037, odds ratio 1.84). There were no significant differences in transfusion, mortality, or survival between the two groups, and no adverse events related to nafamostat mesilate were noted. Hence, nafamostat mesilate may be used as an effective and safe anticoagulant, without increasing the risk of major bleeding complications, in patients prone to bleeding.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01761994.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.