Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25302171›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of clinical oncology2014

Caring for the breast cancer survivor's health and well-being.

Petra M Casey, Stephanie S Faubion, Kathy L MacLaughlin, Margaret E Long, Sandhya Pruthi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reproductive health care across the lifecourse of the female cancer patient.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Breast cancer under age 40: a different approach.Current treatment options in oncology · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Petra M CaseyPetra M Casey, Margaret E Long, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Stephanie S FaubionPetra M Casey, Margaret E Long, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Kathy L MacLaughlinPetra M Casey, Margaret E Long, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Margaret E LongPetra M Casey, Margaret E Long, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.
Sandhya PruthiPetra M Casey, Margaret E Long, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The breast cancer care continuum entails detection, diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship. During this time, focus on the whole woman and medical concerns beyond the breast cancer diagnosis itself is essential. In this comprehensive review, we critically review and evaluate recent evidence regarding several topics pertinent to and specific for the woman living with a prior history of breast cancer. More specifically, we discuss the most recent recommendations for contraceptive options including long-acting reversible contraception and emergency contraception, fertility and pregnancy considerations during and after breast cancer treatment, management of menopausal vasomotors symptoms and vulvovaginal atrophy which often occurs even in young women during treatment for breast cancer. The need to directly query the patient about these concerns is emphasized. Our focus is on non-systemic hormones and non-hormonal options. Our holistic approach to the care of the breast cancer survivor includes such preventive health issues as sexual and bone health,which are important in optimizing quality of life. We also discuss strategies for breast cancer recurrence surveillance in the setting of a prior breast cancer diagnosis. This review is intended for primary care practitioners as well as specialists caring for female breast cancer survivors and includes key points for evidence-based best practice recommendations.

Indexed as

Breast cancerBreast cancer recurrenceBreast cancer surveillanceContraceptionOsteopeniaOsteoporosisSexual healthVasomotor symptomsVulvovaginal atrophy

Identifiers

PMID25302171
PMCPMC4129533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.