Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25301909›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine (London, England)2014

Virtues and values in medicine revisited: individual and global health.

Solomon Benatar, Ross Upshur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Global primary care as an incubator for good ethical practice.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Solomon BenatarUniversity of Cape Town, South Africa and visiting scholar, Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Canada solomon.benatar@uct.ac.za.
Ross UpshurDivision of Clinical Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada, professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada, scientific director, Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Toronto, Canada and Canada Research Chair in Primary Care Research.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to the call from an international panel for 'much needed rethinking' about the goals and purposes of the education of healthcare professionals, we suggest that there must be an explicit account of the virtues and values that will inform healthcare practice in the 21st century. We propose that a renewed emphasis is needed on reviving the well-honed clinical skills and humanistic attributes in medicine as crucial for optimum affordable (and sustainable) care of individual patients. Analogous virtues should be linked to the quest for improving the health of whole populations, nationally and globally.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceVirtuesGlobal HealthHumansPatient CareclinicalEducationvirtues

Identifiers

PMID25301909
PMCPMC4951957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.