Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25301847›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2015

Reproducible, Quantitative, and Flexible Molecular Subtyping of Clinical DLBCL Samples Using the NanoString nCounter System.

Margaret H Veldman-Jones, Zhongwu Lai, Mark Wappett, Chris G Harbron, J Carl Barrett, Elizabeth A Harrington, Kenneth S Thress

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A three-gene signature based onHaematologica · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development and Validation of a Gene Signature Classifier for Consensus Molecular Subtyping of Colorectal Carcinoma in a CLIA-Certified Setting.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Purity Independent Subtyping of Tumors (PurIST), A Clinically Robust, Single-sample Classifier for Tumor Subtyping in Pancreatic Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. A comparability study of immunohistochemical assays for PD-L1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Margaret H Veldman-JonesAstraZeneca Oncology Innovative Medicines, Macclesfield, United Kingdom.
Zhongwu LaiAstraZeneca Oncology Innovative Medicines, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Mark WappettAstraZeneca Oncology Innovative Medicines, Macclesfield, United Kingdom.
Chris G HarbronAstraZeneca Discovery Sciences, Macclesfield, United Kingdom.
J Carl BarrettAstraZeneca Oncology Innovative Medicines, Waltham, Massachusetts.
Elizabeth A HarringtonAstraZeneca Oncology Innovative Medicines, Macclesfield, United Kingdom.
Kenneth S ThressAstraZeneca Oncology Innovative Medicines, Waltham, Massachusetts. Kenneth.Thress@astrazeneca.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease with distinct molecular subtypes. The most established subtyping approach, the "Cell of Origin" (COO) algorithm, categorizes DLBCL into activated B-cell (ABC) and germinal center B-cell (GCB)-like subgroups through gene expression profiling. Recently developed immunohistochemical (IHC) techniques and other established methodologies can deliver discordant results and have various technical limitations. We evaluated the NanoString nCounter gene expression system to address issues with current platforms. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe devised a scoring system using 145 genes from published datasets to categorize DLBCL samples. After cell line validation, clinical tissue segmentation was tested using commercially available diagnostic DLBCL samples. Finally, we profiled biopsies from patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL enrolled in the fostamatinib phase IIb clinical trial using three independent RNA expression platforms: NanoString, Affymetrix, and qNPA.

resultsDiagnostic samples showed a typical spread of subtypes with consistent gene expression profiles across matched fresh, frozen, and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. Results from biopsy samples across platforms were remarkably consistent, in contrast to published IHC data. Interestingly, COO segmentation of longitudinal fostamatinib biopsies taken at initial diagnosis and then again at primary relapse showed 88% concordance (15/17), suggesting that COO designation remains stable over the course of disease progression.

conclusionsDLBCL segmentation of patient tumor samples is possible using a number of expression platforms. However, we found that NanoString offers the most flexibility and fewest limitations in regards to robust clinical tissue subtype characterization. These subtype distinctions should help guide disease prognosis and treatment options within DLBCL clinical practice.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorGene Expression ProfilingHumansLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesReproducibility of ResultsTranscriptomeBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.