Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25301605›Full record

ArticleScience (New York, N.Y.)2014

Cancer. Attack of the clones.

Ramaswamy Govindan

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science (New York, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Comparison of the genomic background of MET-altered carcinomas of the lung: biological differences and analogies.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Single-cell heterogeneity in ductal carcinoma in situ of breast.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2018
    Article
  8. Genomics, Endoscopy, and Control of Gastroesophageal Cancers: A Perspective.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2017
    Review
  9. Biologically Relevant Heterogeneity: Metrics and Practical Insights.SLAS discovery : advancing life sciences R & D · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ramaswamy GovindanDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. rgovinda@dom.wustl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Genetic HeterogeneityGenomic InstabilityAdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungHumansLung NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.