Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2015
Phase II study of carboplatin, docetaxel and bevacizumab for chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Application of Bevacizumab in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate a 3-drug combination of carboplatin, docetaxel and bevacizumab as a front-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC), a single arm phase II study was conducted.
methodsPatients with stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrent non-squamous NSCLC were treated with carboplatin (targeted area under the curve of 6 mg h/L), docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks for 4 to 6 cycles, followed by maintenance with bevacizumab every 3 weeks until disease progression or occurrence of predefined toxicity. The planned patient number was 40, and the primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) as assessed by independent reviewers.
resultsOne patient refused the treatment after enrollment; thus, 39 patients were treated and analyzed. The 3-drug therapy was delivered for a median of 4 cycles, and 54 % of the patients proceeded to the maintenance therapy for a median of 4 cycles. The overall response rate was 74.4 % (29/39), with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) of 60.0 to 88.7 %. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 6.2 months (95 % CI, 4.8-8.5 months) and 22.4 months (95 % CI, 11.3-26.2 months), respectively. Toxicities of grade 3 or higher included neutropenia in 71.8 %, febrile neutropenia in 23.1 %, and hypertension in 38.5 % of the patients, but they were transient and manageable.
conclusionThe primary endpoint was met. The regimen yielded promising results with an excellent overall response rate, PFS, and OS for chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Further studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.