Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25301497›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2015

The spread of Bradyrhizobium lineages across host legume clades: from Abarema to Zygia.

Matthew A Parker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Lupin Root Weevils (Insects · 2021
    Review
  12. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Strains ofInternational journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. A Genomotaxonomy View of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Matthew A ParkerDepartment of Biological Sciences, State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, 13902, USA, mparker@binghamton.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To analyze macroevolutionary patterns in host use by Bradyrhizobium root-nodule bacteria, 420 strains from 75 legume host genera (sampled in 25 countries) were characterized for portions of six housekeeping genes and the nifD locus in the symbiosis island chromosomal region. Most Bradyrhizobium clades utilized very divergent sets of legume hosts. This suggests that Bradyrhizobium spread across the major legume lineages early in its evolution, with only a few derived clades subsequently developing a narrower pattern of host use. Significant modularity existed in the network structure of recent host jumps (inferred from cases where closely related strain pairs were found on different legume taxa). This implies that recent host switching has occurred most often within particular subgroups of legumes. Nevertheless, the observed link structure would allow a bacterial lineage to reach almost any of the 75 legume host genera in a relatively small number of steps. However, permutation tests also showed that symbionts from certain host plant clades were significantly more similar than would be the case if bacteria were distributed at random on the trees. Related legumes thus harbored related sets of symbionts in some cases, indicating some degree of phylogenetic conservatism in partner selection.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSymbiosisBacterial ProteinsBradyrhizobiumDNA, BacterialFabaceaeGenomic IslandsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 23SSequence Analysis, DNABacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.