Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25301010›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2015

Ommaya reservoir infection rate: a 6-year retrospective cohort study of Ommaya reservoir in pediatrics.

Sharafaldeen Bin Nafisah, Maqsood Ahmad

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Infections in Hospitalized Cancer Patients.World journal of oncology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Infections in Cancer Patients with Solid Tumors: A Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sharafaldeen Bin NafisahNational Neurosciences Institute, King Fahad Medical City, PO Box 395529, Riyadh, 11375, Saudi Arabia, Dr.sharafaldeen@yahoo.com.
Maqsood Ahmad

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this study, we investigated Ommaya reservoir among pediatric patients, its infection rate, and the predisposing factors. We also investigated its role in the reduction of CSF protein. Finally, we explored other factors that would influence the decision to insert an Ommaya in comparison to external ventricular drainage.

methodsThis is a 6-year retrospective cohort study from a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia.

resultsIn our study, females were 48.9% (n = 22) while males were 51.1% (n = 23). The mean age at insertion was 2.9 days, SD of 1.67 day. The mean weight at insertion was 0.98 kg, SD of 0.57 kg. The total duration of Ommaya days was 2523 days. The median duration of the reservoir was 21 days. The Ommaya reservoir infection rate was 6.6%. We found an association between organisms cultured from urinary tract and the organisms cultured from the CSF. We also found that CSF protein level is lower in non-infected reservoirs in comparison to those with infection. The number of Ommaya days and the number of days of infection could not explain the mean CSF protein.

conclusionsOmmaya reservoir has a low infection rate. Although CSF protein increased by infection, we failed to prove that Ommaya tapping provides a reduction in the CSF protein and, hence, reduction of shunt malfunctions thereafter. We conclude with expert opinions that take into account the psychological factors in addition to the clinical sense in choosing between Ommaya reservoir and external ventricular drainage (EVD).

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHydrocephalusInfant, NewbornInfectionsMalePostoperative Complications

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.