Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25300902›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2015

Dopaminergic modulation of distracter-resistance and prefrontal delay period signal.

Mirjam Bloemendaal, Martine R van Schouwenburg, Asako Miyakawa, Esther Aarts, Mark D'Esposito, Roshan Cools

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A dopaminergic basis of behavioral control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Dynamic Network Connectivity: from monkeys to humans.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Neuromodulation of prefrontal cortex cognitive function in primates: the powerful roles of monoamines and acetylcholine.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Ignoring versus updating in working memory reveal differential roles of attention and feature binding.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2018
    Article
  18. Interactions of Motivation and Cognitive Control.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Causes and consequences of limitations in visual working memory.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mirjam BloemendaalRadboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, mirjambloemendaal@gmail.com.
Martine R van Schouwenburg
Asako Miyakawa
Esther Aarts
Mark D'Esposito
Roshan Cools

Funding

Dopaminergic modulation of frontostriatal functionR01DA020600 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI D'ESPOSITO, MARK · 2006 to 2010
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01-DA20600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dopamine has long been implicated in the online maintenance of information across short delays. Specifically, dopamine has been proposed to modulate the strength of working memory representations in the face of intervening distracters. This hypothesis has not been tested in humans. We fill this gap using pharmacological neuroimaging. Healthy young subjects were scanned after intake of the dopamine receptor agonist bromocriptine or placebo (in a within-subject, counterbalanced, and double-blind design). During scanning, subjects performed a delayed match-to-sample task with face stimuli. A face or scene distracter was presented during the delay period (between the cue and the probe). Bromocriptine altered distracter-resistance, such that it impaired performance after face relative to scene distraction. Individual differences in the drug effect on distracter-resistance correlated negatively with drug effects on delay period signal in the prefrontal cortex, as well as on functional connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and the fusiform face area. These results provide evidence for the hypothesis that dopaminergic modulation of the prefrontal cortex alters resistance of working memory representations to distraction. Moreover, we show that the effects of dopamine on the distracter-resistance of these representations are accompanied by modulation of the functional strength of connections between the prefrontal cortex and stimulus-specific posterior cortex.

Indexed as

AdolescentAttentionBromocriptineCuesDopamineDopamine AgonistsDouble-Blind MethodFaceFemaleHumansIndividualityMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermPrefrontal CortexReaction TimeBromocriptineDopamineDopamine Agonists

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.