ArticleThe patient2015
Walking in the shoes of patients, not just in their genes: a patient-centered approach to genomic medicine.
Article in The patient, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Reflections on 'common' genetic medical history questions: Time to examine the what, why, and how.Patient education and counseling · 2024Article
- "Where do I go? Who do I go to?": BRCA Previvors, genetic counselors and family planning.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Dissemination of a long-term care planning tool, PlanYourLifespan.org, through community-based stakeholder leaders.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- Managing uncertainty and responding to difficult emotions: Cancer patients' perspectives on clinician response during the COVID-19 pandemic.Patient education and counseling · 2022Article
- Leveraging Patient/Community Partnerships to Disseminate Patient Centered Outcomes Research in Geriatrics.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- How do providers discuss the results of pediatric exome sequencing with families?Personalized medicine · 2017Article
- Providing guidance for genomics-based cancer treatment decisions: insights from stakeholder engagement for post-prostatectomy radiation therapy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2017Article
- Assessing Patient-Centered Communication in Cancer Care: Measures for Surveillance of Communication Outcomes.Journal of oncology practice · 2016Article
- Do Men Receive Information Required for Shared Decision Making About PSA Testing? Results from a National Survey.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016Article
- Health Self-Efficacy Among Populations with Multiple Chronic Conditions: the Value of Patient-Centered Communication.Advances in therapy · 2016Article
- Assessing patients' experiences with communication across the cancer care continuum.Patient education and counseling · 2016Article
- Information Needs in the Precision Medicine Era: How Genetics Home Reference Can Help.Interactive journal of medical research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic technologies are increasing the precision with which clinicians can assess an individual patient's risk for developing diseases and identify which patients are likely to benefit from specific treatments. Also advocating for a shift away from a one-size-fits-all approach is the growing emphasis on "patient-centered" care. Using examples from breast cancer, we make a case for why, in order to optimize patient health outcomes, genomic medicine will need to be practiced within a patient-centered framework. We present a six-function conceptual framework for patient-centered care and discuss findings from a national survey evaluating the patient-centeredness of care delivered in the USA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25300612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.