Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25300580›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2014

Hedgehog activity controls opening of the primary mouth.

Jacqueline M Tabler, Trióna G Bolger, John Wallingford, Karen J Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pituitary Gland Duplication Syndrome: An International Imaging Analysis.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Mouth development.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Dynamic epithelia of the developing vertebrate face.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2015
    Review
  18. Sonic hedgehog signaling in craniofacial development.Differentiation; research in biological diversity
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jacqueline M TablerDepartment of Craniofacial Development and Stem Cell Biology, King׳s College London, UK; Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, USA.
Trióna G BolgerDepartment of Craniofacial Development and Stem Cell Biology, King׳s College London, UK.
John WallingfordDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, USA.
Karen J LiuDepartment of Craniofacial Development and Stem Cell Biology, King׳s College London, UK. Electronic address: karen.liu@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Development and function in mucociliary epitheliaR01HL117164 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI John B Wallingford · 2013 to 2026
$4.7M
Mechanism of vertebrate neural tube morphogenesisR01GM074104 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI WALLINGFORD, JOHN B · 2005 to 2014
$2.6M
Cell dynamics in calvarial morphogenesisF32DE023272 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI TABLER, JACQUI · 2012 to 2015
$161k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E013872/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I021922/1Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHLBI NIH HHS HL117164NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117164NIDCR NIH HHS F32 DE023272NIDCR NIH HHS F32DE023272NIGMS NIH HHS GM074104NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074104Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 081880/Z/06/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To feed or breathe, the oral opening must connect with the gut. The foregut and oral tissues converge at the primary mouth, forming the buccopharyngeal membrane (BPM), a bilayer epithelium. Failure to form the opening between gut and mouth has significant ramifications, and many craniofacial disorders have been associated with defects in this process. Oral perforation is characterized by dissolution of the BPM, but little is known about this process. In humans, failure to form a continuous mouth opening is associated with mutations in Hedgehog (Hh) pathway members; however, the role of Hh in primary mouth development is untested. Here, we show, using Xenopus, that Hh signaling is necessary and sufficient to initiate mouth formation, and that Hh activation is required in a dose-dependent fashion to determine the size of the mouth. This activity lies upstream of the previously demonstrated role for Wnt signal inhibition in oral perforation. We then turn to mouse mutants to establish that SHH and Gli3 are indeed necessary for mammalian mouth development. Our data suggest that Hh-mediated BPM persistence may underlie oral defects in human craniofacial syndromes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBasement MembraneEpitheliumFibronectinsGastrointestinal TractGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHedgehog ProteinsHumansImmunohistochemistryKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMiceMorpholinesMouthNerve Tissue ProteinsPurinesRepressor ProteinsFibronectinsGli3 protein, mouseGLI3 protein, XenopusHedgehog ProteinsKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsMorpholinesNerve Tissue ProteinsPurinespurmorphamineRepressor ProteinsShh protein, mouseShh protein, XenopusWnt ProteinsXenopus ProteinsZinc Finger Protein Gli3Buccopharyngeal membraneFibronectinHedgehogMousePrimary mouthStomodeumWntXenopus

Identifiers

PMID25300580
PMCPMC4252736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.