Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25300474›Full record

ReviewCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2015

Opportunities and challenges for the use of large-scale surveys in public health research: a comparison of the assessment of cancer screening behaviors.

Jada G Hamilton, Nancy Breen, Carrie N Klabunde, Richard P Moser, Bryan Leyva, Erica S Breslau, Sarah C Kobrin

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jada G HamiltonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. hamiltoj@mskcc.org.
Nancy BreenHealth Services and Economics Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Rockville, Maryland.
Carrie N KlabundeHealth Services and Economics Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Rockville, Maryland.
Richard P MoserScience of Research and Technology Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Rockville, Maryland.
Bryan LeyvaProcess of Care Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Rockville, Maryland.
Erica S BreslauProcess of Care Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Rockville, Maryland.
Sarah C KobrinProcess of Care Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, NCI, NIH, Rockville, Maryland.
National Cancer Institute · USUnited States Department of Health and Human Services · USCenter for Cancer Research · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large-scale surveys that assess cancer prevention and control behaviors are a readily available, rich resource for public health researchers. Although these data are used by a subset of researchers who are familiar with them, their potential is not fully realized by the research community for reasons including lack of awareness of the data and limited understanding of their content, methodology, and utility. Until now, no comprehensive resource existed to describe and facilitate use of these data. To address this gap and maximize use of these data, we catalogued the characteristics and content of four surveys that assessed cancer screening behaviors in 2005, the most recent year with concurrent periods of data collection: the National Health Interview Survey, Health Information National Trends Survey, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, and California Health Interview Survey. We documented each survey's characteristics, measures of cancer screening, and relevant correlates; examined how published studies (n = 78) have used the surveys' cancer screening data; and reviewed new cancer screening constructs measured in recent years. This information can guide researchers in deciding how to capitalize on the opportunities presented by these data resources.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth BehaviorHealth SurveysHumansPublic HealthRisk-Taking

Identifiers

PMID25300474
PMCPMC4294943
OpenAlexW2154065839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.