Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25300435›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2014

Relative roles of CD90 and c-kit to the regenerative efficacy of cardiosphere-derived cells in humans and in a mouse model of myocardial infarction.

Ke Cheng, Ahmed Ibrahim, M Taylor Hensley, Deliang Shen, Baiming Sun, Ryan Middleton, Weixin Liu, Rachel R Smith, Eduardo Marbán

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Stem cell treatment for acute myocardial infarction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ke ChengCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (K.C., A.I., B.S., R.M., W.L., R.R.S., E.M.) Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences and Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (K.C., T.H.) Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC (K.C.).
Ahmed IbrahimCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (K.C., A.I., B.S., R.M., W.L., R.R.S., E.M.).
M Taylor HensleyDepartment of Molecular Biomedical Sciences and Center for Comparative Medicine and Translational Research, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (K.C., T.H.).
Deliang ShenDepartment of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China (D.S.).
Baiming SunCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (K.C., A.I., B.S., R.M., W.L., R.R.S., E.M.).
Ryan MiddletonCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (K.C., A.I., B.S., R.M., W.L., R.R.S., E.M.).
Weixin LiuCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (K.C., A.I., B.S., R.M., W.L., R.R.S., E.M.).
Rachel R SmithCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (K.C., A.I., B.S., R.M., W.L., R.R.S., E.M.) Capricor Therapeutics Inc, Beverly Hills, CA (R.R.S.).
Eduardo MarbánCedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, CA (K.C., A.I., B.S., R.M., W.L., R.R.S., E.M.).
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · USNorth Carolina State University · USFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Electrophysiology and Cell Biology of Cardiac Stem CellsR01HL083109 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARBAN, EDUARDO · 2006 to 2014
$3.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000124NHLBI NIH HHS 2R01HL083109NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL083109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe regenerative potential of cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) for ischemic heart disease has been demonstrated in mice, rats, pigs, and a recently completed clinical trial (CADUCEUS). CDCs are CD105(+) stromal cells of intrinsic cardiac origin, but the antigenic characteristics of the active fraction remain to be defined. CDCs contain a small minority of c-kit(+) cells, which have been argued to be cardiac progenitors, and a variable fraction of CD90(+) cells whose bioactivity is unclear.

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of data from the CADUCEUS trial and a prospective mouse study to elucidate the roles of c-kit(+) and CD90(+) cells in human CDCs. Here, we show, surprisingly, that c-kit expression has no relationship to CDCs' therapeutic efficacy in humans, and depletion of c-kit(+) cells does not undermine the structural and functional benefits of CDCs in a mouse model of myocardial infarction (MI). In contrast, CD90 expression negatively correlates with the therapeutic benefit of CDCs in humans (ie, higher CD90 expression associated with lower efficacy). Depletion of CD90(+) cells augments the functional potency of CDCs in murine MI. CD90(-) CDCs secrete lower levels of inflammatory cytokines and can differentiate into cardiomyocytes in vitro and in vivo.

conclusionThe majority population of CDCs (CD105(+)/CD90(-)/c-kit(-)) constitutes the active fraction, both in terms of therapeutic efficacy and in the ability to undergo cardiomyogenic differentiation. The c-kit(+) fraction is neither necessary for, nor contributory to, the regenerative efficacy of CDCs.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsApoptosisBiomarkersCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCell TransplantationDisease Models, AnimalHeart Function TestsHumansMaleMiceMice, SCIDMyocardial InfarctionMyocytes, CardiacProspective StudiesBiomarkersProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitThy-1 Antigenscardiosphere‐derived cellsCD90ckitmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID25300435
PMCPMC4323830
OpenAlexW2137731178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.