ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2014
Renal denervation therapy for resistant hypertension.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neurogenic hypertension: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementHypertension is common and leads to significant cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Some patients are unable to achieve target blood pressures despite multiple antihypertensive medications; these patients are labeled as having resistant hypertension. To palliate the lack of pharmacologic options, recent technological advances led to the development of an interventional procedure to treat hypertension, namely renal sympathetic denervation. This percutaneous procedure involves the ablation of the afferent and efferent nerves surrounding the renal arteries. Many studies that were primarily observational in nature had very promising results. Systolic blood pressure reductions in the order of 25-30 mm Hg were observed in a series of unblinded studies, leading to the approval and widespread use of this technology across Europe, Australia, and Canada. However, a recent rigorous single blinded sham-controlled clinical trial failed to meet its efficacy endpoints. There are several postulated reasons for the conflicting results, which are discussed in this manuscript. These recent findings make us reflect on the need for rigorous clinical trials prior to the early approval and clinical adoption of novel technologies. At the moment, renal denervation remains an investigational procedure. Several trials are underway using different technologies, which, upon completion, will clarify the proper role of renal denervation for the treatment of patients with resistant hypertension.
Identifiers
25300359What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.