Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25300298›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2014

The Role of Stem Cells in Wound Angiogenesis.

Alice King, Swathi Balaji, Sundeep G Keswani, Timothy M Crombleholme

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Regenerative and translational medicine in COPD: hype and hope.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  11. Chronic Wound Healing Models.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Mechanical regulation of the early stages of angiogenesis.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alice KingLaboratory for Regenerative Wound Healing, Division of Pediatric, General, Thoracic and Fetal Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Swathi BalajiLaboratory for Regenerative Wound Healing, Division of Pediatric, General, Thoracic and Fetal Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Sundeep G KeswaniLaboratory for Regenerative Wound Healing, Division of Pediatric, General, Thoracic and Fetal Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, Ohio.
Timothy M CrombleholmeCenter for Children's Surgery, Division of Pediatric General, Thoracic and Fetal Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, School of Medicine, University of Colorado , Aurora, Colorado.

Funding

Novel Mechanisms of Regenerative Wound HealingR01GM111808 · NIGMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI Sundeep G Keswani · 2014 to 2026
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111808
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID25300298
PMCPMC4183912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.