Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25299936›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2014

Probing the origins of catalytic discrimination between phosphate and sulfate monoester hydrolysis: comparative analysis of alkaline phosphatase and protein tyrosine phosphatases.

Logan D Andrews, Jesse G Zalatan, Daniel Herschlag

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evolutionary repurposing of a sulfatase: A new Michaelis complex leads to efficient transition state charge offset.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Electric Fields and Enzyme Catalysis.Annual review of biochemistry · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Prediction of distal residue participation in enzyme catalysis.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2015
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Logan D AndrewsDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, ‡Department of Chemistry, and §Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305-5307, United States.
Jesse G Zalatan
Daniel Herschlag

Funding

Study of Nonenzymatic and Enzymatic Phosphoryl TransferR01GM064798 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Polly Morrell Fordyce, DANIEL HERSCHLAG · 2002 to 2026
$5.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM64798NIGMS NIH HHS R1GM064798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catalytic promiscuity, the ability of enzymes to catalyze multiple reactions, provides an opportunity to gain a deeper understanding of the origins of catalysis and substrate specificity. Alkaline phosphatase (AP) catalyzes both phosphate and sulfate monoester hydrolysis reactions with a ∼10(10)-fold preference for phosphate monoester hydrolysis, despite the similarity between these reactions. The preponderance of formal positive charge in the AP active site, particularly from three divalent metal ions, was proposed to be responsible for this preference by providing stronger electrostatic interactions with the more negatively charged phosphoryl group versus the sulfuryl group. To test whether positively charged metal ions are required to achieve a high preference for the phosphate monoester hydrolysis reaction, the catalytic preference of three protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), which do not contain metal ions, were measured. Their preferences ranged from 5 × 10(6) to 7 × 10(7), lower than that for AP but still substantial, indicating that metal ions and a high preponderance of formal positive charge within the active site are not required to achieve a strong catalytic preference for phosphate monoester over sulfate monoester hydrolysis. The observed ionic strength dependences of kcat/KM values for phosphate and sulfate monoester hydrolysis are steeper for the more highly charged phosphate ester with both AP and the PTP Stp1, following the dependence expected based on the charge difference of these two substrates. However, the dependences for AP were not greater than those of Stp1 and were rather shallow for both enzymes. These results suggest that overall electrostatics from formal positive charge within the active site is not the major driving force in distinguishing between these reactions and that substantial discrimination can be attained without metal ions. Thus, local properties of the active site, presumably including multiple positioned dipolar hydrogen bond donors within the active site, dominate in defining this reaction specificity.

Indexed as

Alkaline PhosphataseHumansHydrolysisOrganophosphatesProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesStatic ElectricitySubstrate SpecificitySulfuric Acid EstersAlkaline PhosphataseOrganophosphatesProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesSulfuric Acid Esters

Identifiers

PMID25299936
PMCPMC4222534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.