Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25299688›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Depletion of the chromatin looping proteins CTCF and cohesin causes chromatin compaction: insight into chromatin folding by polymer modelling.

Mariliis Tark-Dame, Hansjoerg Jerabek, Erik M M Manders, Ingrid M van der Wateren, Dieter W Heermann, Roel van Driel

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Contribution of transposable elements and distal enhancers to evolution of human-specific features of interphase chromatin architecture in embryonic stem cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Perspectives: using polymer modeling to understand the formation and function of nuclear compartments.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2017
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Pairing and anti-pairing: a balancing act in the diploid genome.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mariliis Tark-DameSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hansjoerg JerabekInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Erik M M MandersVan Leeuwenhoek Centre for Advanced Microscopy, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department for Molecular Biotechnology, University of Gent, Gent, Belgium.
Ingrid M van der WaterenSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dieter W HeermannInstitute for Theoretical Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Roel van DrielSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Folding of the chromosomal fibre in interphase nuclei is an important element in the regulation of gene expression. For instance, physical contacts between promoters and enhancers are a key element in cell-type-specific transcription. We know remarkably little about the principles that control chromosome folding. Here we explore the view that intrachromosomal interactions, forming a complex pattern of loops, are a key element in chromosome folding. CTCF and cohesin are two abundant looping proteins of interphase chromosomes of higher eukaryotes. To investigate the role of looping in large-scale (supra Mb) folding of human chromosomes, we knocked down the gene that codes for CTCF and the one coding for Rad21, an essential subunit of cohesin. We measured the effect on chromosome folding using systematic 3D fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Results show that chromatin becomes more compact after reducing the concentration of these two looping proteins. The molecular basis for this counter-intuitive behaviour is explored by polymer modelling usingy the Dynamic Loop model (Bohn M, Heermann DW (2010) Diffusion-driven looping provides a consistent framework for chromatin organization. PLoS ONE 5: e12218.). We show that compaction can be explained by selectively decreasing the number of short-range loops, leaving long-range looping unchanged. In support of this model prediction it has recently been shown by others that CTCF and cohesin indeed are responsible primarily for short-range looping. Our results suggest that the local and the overall changes in of chromosome structure are controlled by a delicate balance between short-range and long-range loops, allowing easy switching between, for instance, open and more compact chromatin states.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularApoptosisCCCTC-Binding FactorCell Cycle ProteinsCells, CulturedChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Knockdown TechniquesHumansNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsPolymersCCCTC-Binding FactorCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinsCTCF protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsNuclear ProteinsPhosphoproteinsPolymersRAD21 protein, humanRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25299688
PMCPMC4191888
OpenAlexW2101284538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.