Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25299511›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Twelve years of rabies surveillance in Sri Lanka, 1999-2010.

Dushantha Karunanayake, Takashi Matsumoto, Omala Wimalaratne, Susilakanthi Nanayakkara, Devika Perera, Akira Nishizono, Kamruddin Ahmed

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Lyssavirus in Indian Flying Foxes, Sri Lanka.Emerging infectious diseases · 2016
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Neurology Practice in India: At Crossroads.Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dushantha KarunanayakeDepartment of Rabies Diagnosis and Research, Medical Research Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Takashi MatsumotoDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
Omala WimalaratneDepartment of Rabies Diagnosis and Research, Medical Research Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Susilakanthi NanayakkaraDepartment of Rabies Diagnosis and Research, Medical Research Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Devika PereraDepartment of Rabies Diagnosis and Research, Medical Research Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Akira NishizonoDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
Kamruddin AhmedDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan; Research Promotion Institute, Oita University, Yufu, Japan.
Medical Research Institute · LKOita University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRabies is endemic in Sri Lanka, but little is known about the temporal and spatial trends of rabies in this country. Knowing these trends may provide insight into past control efforts and serve as the basis for future control measures. In this study, we analyzed distribution of rabies in humans and animals over a period of 12 years in Sri Lanka.

methodsAccumulated data from 1999 through 2010 compiled by the Department of Rabies Diagnosis and Research, Medical Research Institute (MRI), Colombo, were used in this study.

resultsThe yearly mean percentage of rabies-positive sample was 62.4% (47.6-75.9%). Three-fourths of the rabies-positive samples were from the Colombo, Gampaha, and Kalutara districts in Western province, followed by Galle in Southern province. A high percentage of the rabies samples were from dogs (85.2%), followed by cats (7.9%), humans (3.8%), wild animals (2.0%), and livestock (1.1%). Among wild animals, mongooses were the main victims followed by civets. The number of suspect human rabies cases decreased gradually in Sri Lanka, although the number of human samples submitted for laboratory confirmation increased.

conclusionsThe number of rabid dogs has remained relatively unchanged, but the number of suspect human rabies is decreasing gradually in Sri Lanka. These findings indicate successful use of postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) by animal bite victims and increased rabies awareness. PEP is free of charge and is supplied through government hospitals by the Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka. Our survey shows that most positive samples were received from Western and Southern provinces, possibly because of the ease of transporting samples to the laboratory. Submissions of wild animal and livestock samples should be increased by creating more awareness among the public. Better rabies surveillance will require introduction of molecular methods for detection and the establishment of more regional rabies diagnostic laboratories.

Indexed as

Post-Exposure ProphylaxisAnimalsAnimals, WildBites and StingsCat DiseasesCatsDog DiseasesDogsGeographyHerpestidaeHumansLivestockRabiesRabies VaccinesRetrospective StudiesSri LankaRabies Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25299511
PMCPMC4191952
OpenAlexW2085384678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.