Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25299485›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Fast evolution from precast bricks: genomics of young freshwater populations of threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus.

Nadezhda V Terekhanova, Maria D Logacheva, Aleksey A Penin, Tatiana V Neretina, Anna E Barmintseva, Georgii A Bazykin, Alexey S Kondrashov, Nikolai S Mugue

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Detecting parallel polygenic adaptation to novel evolutionary pressure in wild populations: a case study in Atlantic cod (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Genomic changes underlying repeated niche shifts in an adaptive radiation.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadezhda V TerekhanovaDepartment of Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Maria D LogachevaDepartment of Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia; A. N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Aleksey A PeninDepartment of Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Genetics, Biological faculty, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana V NeretinaDepartment of Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia; White Sea Biological Station, Biological faculty, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Anna E BarmintsevaLaboratory of Molecular genetics, Russian Institute of Fisheries and Oceanology, Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, Moscow, Russia.
Georgii A BazykinDepartment of Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia; Sector for Molecular Evolution, Institute for Information Transmission Problems of the RAS (Kharkevich Institute), Moscow, Russia.
Alexey S KondrashovDepartment of Bioinformatics and Bioengineering, M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Nikolai S MugueLaboratory of Molecular genetics, Russian Institute of Fisheries and Oceanology, Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, Moscow, Russia; N. K. Koltsov Institute of Developmental Biology RAS, Moscow, Russia.
Lomonosov Moscow State University · RUAll-Russian Research Institute Fisheries and Oceanography · RUKoltzov Institute of Developmental Biology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptation is driven by natural selection; however, many adaptations are caused by weak selection acting over large timescales, complicating its study. Therefore, it is rarely possible to study selection comprehensively in natural environments. The threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) is a well-studied model organism with a short generation time, small genome size, and many genetic and genomic tools available. Within this originally marine species, populations have recurrently adapted to freshwater all over its range. This evolution involved extensive parallelism: pre-existing alleles that adapt sticklebacks to freshwater habitats, but are also present at low frequencies in marine populations, have been recruited repeatedly. While a number of genomic regions responsible for this adaptation have been identified, the details of selection remain poorly understood. Using whole-genome resequencing, we compare pooled genomic samples from marine and freshwater populations of the White Sea basin, and identify 19 short genomic regions that are highly divergent between them, including three known inversions. 17 of these regions overlap protein-coding genes, including a number of genes with predicted functions that are relevant for adaptation to the freshwater environment. We then analyze four additional independently derived young freshwater populations of known ages, two natural and two artificially established, and use the observed shifts of allelic frequencies to estimate the strength of positive selection. Adaptation turns out to be quite rapid, indicating strong selection acting simultaneously at multiple regions of the genome, with selection coefficients of up to 0.27. High divergence between marine and freshwater genotypes, lack of reduction in polymorphism in regions responsible for adaptation, and high frequencies of freshwater alleles observed even in young freshwater populations are all consistent with rapid assembly of G. aculeatus freshwater genotypes from pre-existing genomic regions of adaptive variation, with strong selection that favors this assembly acting simultaneously at multiple loci.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionGenetics, PopulationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsAquatic OrganismsFemaleFresh WaterGene FrequencyGenomeMaleRussiaSelection, GeneticSmegmamorpha

Identifiers

PMID25299485
PMCPMC4191950
OpenAlexW2088750316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.