Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25299455›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

The specification and global reprogramming of histone epigenetic marks during gamete formation and early embryo development in C. elegans.

Mark Samson, Margaret M Jow, Catherine C L Wong, Colin Fitzpatrick, Aaron Aslanian, Israel Saucedo, Rodrigo Estrada, Takashi Ito, Sung-kyu Robin Park, John R Yates and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Progeny effects of rotenone exposure depend on parental toxicity.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Connecting the DOTs on Cell Identity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mark SamsonDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Margaret M JowDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Catherine C L WongDepartment of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America; Mass Spectrometry Division, National Center for Protein Science Shanghai, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai, China.
Colin FitzpatrickDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Aaron AslanianDepartment of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Israel SaucedoDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Rodrigo EstradaDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Takashi ItoDepartment of Biochemistry, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan.
Sung-kyu Robin ParkDepartment of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
John R YatesDepartment of Chemical Physiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Diana S ChuDepartment of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
San Francisco State University · USScripps Research Institute · USCenter for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science · CNNagasaki University · JP

Funding

ZDS2P REGULATES SWE1P-DEPENDENT POLARIZED CELL GROWTH IN S CEREVISIAEP41RR011823 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, TRACY · 1996 to 2011
$24.7M
TrainingP41GM103533 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2021
$20.7M
Student EnrichmentP20MD000544 · NIMHD · SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BAIRD, TEASTER T · 2003 to 2012
$9.4M
Defining PP1 phosphatase function in paternal meiotic chromosome segregationR15HD068996 · NICHD · SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CHU, DIANA S. · 2011 to 2011
$460k
NCRR NIH HHS 5P41RR011823-17NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR011823NICHD NIH HHS R15 HD068996NIGMS NIH HHS 8P41GM103533-17NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103533NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to the DNA contributed by sperm and oocytes, embryos receive parent-specific epigenetic information that can include histone variants, histone post-translational modifications (PTMs), and DNA methylation. However, a global view of how such marks are erased or retained during gamete formation and reprogrammed after fertilization is lacking. To focus on features conveyed by histones, we conducted a large-scale proteomic identification of histone variants and PTMs in sperm and mixed-stage embryo chromatin from C. elegans, a species that lacks conserved DNA methylation pathways. The fate of these histone marks was then tracked using immunostaining. Proteomic analysis found that sperm harbor ∼2.4 fold lower levels of histone PTMs than embryos and revealed differences in classes of PTMs between sperm and embryos. Sperm chromatin repackaging involves the incorporation of the sperm-specific histone H2A variant HTAS-1, a widespread erasure of histone acetylation, and the retention of histone methylation at sites that mark the transcriptional history of chromatin domains during spermatogenesis. After fertilization, we show HTAS-1 and 6 histone PTM marks distinguish sperm and oocyte chromatin in the new embryo and characterize distinct paternal and maternal histone remodeling events during the oocyte-to-embryo transition. These include the exchange of histone H2A that is marked by ubiquitination, retention of HTAS-1, removal of the H2A variant HTZ-1, and differential reprogramming of histone PTMs. This work identifies novel and conserved features of paternal chromatin that are specified during spermatogenesis and processed in the embryo. Furthermore, our results show that different species, even those with diverged DNA packaging and imprinting strategies, use conserved histone modification and removal mechanisms to reprogram epigenetic information.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAcetylationAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsChromatinEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHistonesMaleMethylationMolecular Sequence DataOocytesProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsChromatinHistones

Identifiers

PMID25299455
PMCPMC4191889
OpenAlexW2090247323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.