Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25299301›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2014

Association of common variants in TCF4 and PTPRG with Fuchs' corneal dystrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lawrence C M Lau, Li Ma, Alvin L Young, Shi Song Rong, Vishal Jhanji, Marten E Brelen, Chi Pui Pang, Li Jia Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Family Matters: The Nurse's Role in Assessing Family Health History in Ocular Disease.Insight (American Society of Ophthalmic Registered Nurses) · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lawrence C M LauDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Prince of Wales hospital, Hong Kong, China; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Li MaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Alvin L YoungDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Prince of Wales hospital, Hong Kong, China; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Shi Song RongDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Vishal JhanjiDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Prince of Wales hospital, Hong Kong, China; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Marten E BrelenDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Prince of Wales hospital, Hong Kong, China; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chi Pui PangDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Prince of Wales hospital, Hong Kong, China; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Li Jia ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Prince of Wales hospital, Hong Kong, China; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNPrince of Wales Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

topicA meta-analysis of TCF4 and PTPRG gene variants in Fuchs' corneal dystrophy (FCD). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To identify novel genetic markers in patients with FCD in different ethnic populations.

methodsMEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for eligible genetic studies on TCF4 and PTPRG in FCD. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of each single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in allelic, dominant and recessive models were estimated using fixed-effect model if I2<50% in the test for heterogeneity, otherwise the random effects model was used.

resultsThirty-three records were obtained, with 8 being suitable for meta-analysis, which included five SNPs in TCF4 and two in PTPRG. There were 1610 FCD patients and 1565 controls tested for TCF4 rs613872. This SNP was strongly associated with FCD in Caucasians (P = 5.0×10-106), with the risk allele G conferring an OR of 3.95 (95% CI: 3.49-4.46). A further 4 TCF4 SNPs (rs17595731, rs2286812, rs618869 and rs9954153) were also significantly associated with FCD in Caucasians (P<10-8). However, we found no SNP associated with FCD in Chinese. In addition, there was no significant association between FCD and PTPRG.

conclusionTCF4 rs613872 is strongly associated with FCD in Caucasians but not in Chinese, which may suggest ethnic diversity in FCD SNP associations. SNPs in PTPRG were not associated with FCD in Caucasians or Chinese populations. Results of this meta-analysis indicate the need for larger-scale and multi-ethnic genetic studies on FCD to further explore the associated gene variants and their roles on the mechanism and genetic basis of FCD.

Indexed as

AgedAllelesAsian PeopleBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsCase-Control StudiesFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptor-Like Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Class 5Transcription Factor 4Transcription FactorsWhite PeopleBasic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcription FactorsGenetic MarkersPTPRG protein, humanReceptor-Like Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases, Class 5TCF4 protein, humanTranscription Factor 4Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID25299301
PMCPMC4192317
OpenAlexW2034719807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.