Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25299159›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The telomerase reverse transcriptase subunit from the dimorphic fungus Ustilago maydis.

Dolores Bautista-España, Estela Anastacio-Marcelino, Guillermo Horta-Valerdi, Antonio Celestino-Montes, Milorad Kojic, Erasmo Negrete-Abascal, Hortensia Reyes-Cervantes, Candelario Vázquez-Cruz, Plinio Guzmán, Patricia Sánchez-Alonso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative genomics ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Global Gene Expression of Post-Senescent Telomerase-NegativeJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Biogenesis of telomerase RNA from a protein-coding mRNA precursor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dolores Bautista-EspañaCentro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas, Instituto de Ciencias, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico.
Estela Anastacio-MarcelinoCentro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas, Instituto de Ciencias, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico.
Guillermo Horta-ValerdiCentro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas, Instituto de Ciencias, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico.
Antonio Celestino-MontesCentro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas, Instituto de Ciencias, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico.
Milorad KojicInstitute of Molecular Genetics and Genetic Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Erasmo Negrete-AbascalFacultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, UNAM, Los Reyes Iztacala, Tlalnepantla, Estado de Mexico, Mexico.
Hortensia Reyes-CervantesFacultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico.
Candelario Vázquez-CruzCentro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas, Instituto de Ciencias, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico.
Plinio GuzmánDepartamento de Ingeniería Genética, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados, Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico.
Patricia Sánchez-AlonsoCentro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Microbiológicas, Instituto de Ciencias, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Puebla, Mexico.
Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla · MXAutonomous University of Tlaxcala · MXUniversity of Belgrade · RS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the reverse transcriptase subunit of telomerase in the dimorphic fungus Ustilago maydis. This protein (Trt1) contains 1371 amino acids and all of the characteristic TERT motifs. Mutants created by disrupting trt1 had senescent traits, such as delayed growth, low replicative potential, and reduced survival, that were reminiscent of the traits observed in est2 budding yeast mutants. Telomerase activity was observed in wild-type fungus sporidia but not those of the disruption mutant. The introduction of a self-replicating plasmid expressing Trt1 into the mutant strain restored growth proficiency and replicative potential. Analyses of trt1 crosses in planta suggested that Trt1 is necessary for teliospore formation in homozygous disrupted diploids and that telomerase is haploinsufficient in heterozygous diploids. Additionally, terminal restriction fragment analysis in the progeny hinted at alternative survival mechanisms similar to those of budding yeast.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceDiploidyDNA ReplicationGene Expression Regulation, FungalSporesTelomeraseUstilagoTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID25299159
PMCPMC4192592
OpenAlexW2031550132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.