ArticleIndian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB2014
Administering the Optimum Dose of l-Arginine in Regional Tumor Therapy.
Article in Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing and predicting the in vivo activity of AT9283 as a monotherapy and in combination with paclitaxel.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2015Article
- Data to establish the optimal standard regimen and predicting the response to docetaxel therapy.Data in brief · 2015Article
- Predicting Effectiveness of Imatinib Mesylate in Tumors Expressing Platelet-Derived Growth Factors (PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB), Stem Cell Factor Ligands and Their Respective Receptors (PDGFR-α, PDGFR-β, and c-kit).Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2015Article
- Induction of multiple sclerosis and response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2014Article
- Identifying the optimal dose of ritonavir in the treatment of malignancies.Metabolic brain disease · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is optimizing the l-arginine (l-Arg) doses on the basis of chemical structure in regional accessible tumor therapy to settle down a new protocol for the treatment of cancer. (3)H-thymidine-based cell proliferation assay was performed in vitro on tumor cell lines of fibrosarcoma (FS), lymphosarcoma-ascitic and on normal cell line of NIH 3T3 after treatment with different concentrations of l-Arg in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). The cultures were harvested after 22 h and the incorporated radioactivity was counted to identify their histologic grades as described in earlier studies. In vivo therapy of murine tumors was conducted where FS cells injected subcutaneously at ventro-lateral position of mice. Various drug delivery schedules were injected into the centre of tumor base, once a day for 4 days. Tumor diameter and survivals were monitored where the day of sacrifice was considered for monitoring the survival period. By identifying the histologic grades of the treated cultures in vitro and in vivo by different concentrations of l-Arg, the corresponding energy of such concentrations were determined. An efficient model with a good fit (R(2) = 0.98) was established to describe the energy yield by l-Arg dose. The equivalence between the tumor histologic grade and energy of the l-Arg dose delivered in saline (PBS) environment is the optimum condition for regional tumor therapy achieves higher survival rate. The selective cytotoxicity to tumor cells with minimal damage to normal cells by l-Arg due to its chemical structure suggests to be considered the most promising drug for regional therapy of the accessible tumors like breast cancers of early stage with no distant metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.