Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25298386›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Response characteristics of pruriceptive and nociceptive trigeminoparabrachial tract neurons in the rat.

Nico A Jansen, Glenn J Giesler

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Supraspinal Circuit Mechanisms Underlying Itch Processing.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Central neural circuits underlying itch sensation.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Dynorphinergic Projections from the Central Amygdala to the Parabrachial Nucleus Regulate Itch.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pain and itch processing by subpopulations of molecularly diverse spinal and trigeminal projection neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Central circuit mechanisms of itch.Nature communications · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. The Challenge of Basic Itch Research.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nico A JansenDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and.
Glenn J GieslerDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota giesler@umn.edu.
Erasmus MC · NLUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Research Project CoreP01NS047399 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LA MOTTE, ROBERT H · 2004 to 2013
$11.0M
NINDS Center Core at the University of MinnesotaP30NS062158 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI EBNER, TIMOTHY · 2011 to 2015
$3.5M
NINDS NIH HHS NS-062158NINDS NIH HHS P01-NS-047399NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS062158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested the possibility that the trigeminoparabrachial tract (VcPbT), a projection thought to be importantly involved in nociception, might also contribute to sensation of itch. In anesthetized rats, 47 antidromically identified VcPbT neurons with receptive fields involving the cheek were characterized for their responses to graded mechanical and thermal stimuli and intradermal injections of pruritogens (serotonin, chloroquine, and β-alanine), partial pruritogens (histamine and capsaicin), and an algogen (mustard oil). All pruriceptive VcPbT neurons were responsive to mechanical stimuli, and more than half were additionally responsive to thermal stimuli. The majority of VcPbT neurons were activated by injections of serotonin, histamine, capsaicin, and/or mustard oil. A subset of neurons were inhibited by injection of chloroquine. The large majority of VcPbT neurons projected to the ipsilateral and/or contralateral external lateral parabrachial and Kölliker-Fuse nuclei, as evidenced by antidromic mapping techniques. Analyses of mean responses and spike-timing dynamics of VcPbT neurons suggested clear differences in firing rates between responses to noxious and pruritic stimuli. Comparisons between the present data and those previously obtained from trigeminothalamic tract (VcTT) neurons demonstrated several differences in responses to some pruritogens. For example, responses of VcPbT neurons to injection of serotonin often endured for nearly an hour and showed a delayed peak in discharge rate. In contrast, responses of VcTT neurons endured for roughly 20 min and no delayed peak of firing was noted. Thus the longer duration responses to 5-HT and the delay in peak firing of VcPbT neurons better matched behavioral responses to stimulation in awake rats than did those of VcTT neurons. The results indicate that VcPbT neurons may have important roles in the signaling of itch as well as pain.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsbeta-AlanineCapsaicinCheekChloroquineHistamineHot TemperatureMaleMustard PlantNeural PathwaysNociceptive PainParabrachial NucleusPhysical StimulationPlant OilsPruritusbeta-AlanineCapsaicinChloroquineHistaminemustard oilPlant OilsSerotoninintraparietal sulcusneuronneurophysiologyprincipal sulcusworking memory

Identifiers

PMID25298386
PMCPMC4294571
OpenAlexW2118933199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.