Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25298320›Full record

ArticleScience translational medicine2014

A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception.

Daniel W Tan, Matthew A Schiefer, Michael W Keith, James Robert Anderson, Joyce Tyler, Dustin J Tyler

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Science translational medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 294 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
294citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04217005 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Enhancing Functional and Cognitive Performances in People With Amputation and Peripheral Neuropathy Through the Restoration of Sensory Feedback in Real World and Virtual Reality Environments

TypeinterventionalSponsorETH ZurichRan2019 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsLower Limb Amputation Knee, Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury), Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury), Diabetic Peripheral NeuropathyArmsSensory Feedback
NCT05650931 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Phantom Limb Pain After Upper Limb Amputation for Phantom Limb Pain Suppression and Development of the Biomarkers

TypeinterventionalSponsorArtur BiktimirovRan2021 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsPhantom Limb Pain, Phantom Pain, AmputationArmsImplantation of PNS electrodes during surgery, mapping to select sites with the best effect and pain modulation., SCS electrode implantation at surgery, mapping to select sites with the best effect and pain modulation., EEG to search for phantom pain biomarkers
NCT05807607 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Peripheral Nerve and Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Pain Syndrome as a Result of Lower Limb Amputation in Order to Relieve Pain Syndrome and Develop Phantom Pain Biomarkers

TypeinterventionalSponsorArtur BiktimirovRan2022 to 2025Enrolled10ConditionsPhantom Limb Pain, Phantom Pain, Amputation, Lower Limb AmputationArmsImplantation of PNS electrodes during surgery, mapping to select sites with the best effect and daily modulation., SCS electrode implantation at surgery, mapping to select sites with the best effect and pain modulation, Change according to the scale of the PainDetect questionnaire
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

294 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. The Electronic Grip Gauge (EGG): Automated Assessment of Sensorimotor Hand Function Using an Instrumented Fragile Object.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

234 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel W TanLouis Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Matthew A SchieferLouis Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Michael W KeithLouis Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA.
James Robert AndersonLouis Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. University Hospitals Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Joyce TylerMetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA.
Dustin J TylerLouis Stokes Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44109, USA. dustin.tyler@case.edu.

Funding

Peripheral Interfaces in Amputees to Restore SensationI01RX001334 · VA · LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI TYLER, DUSTIN J. · 2015 to 2018
–
Neural Interface and Control Design to Restore Sensation in AmputeesIK1RX000724 · VA · LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHIEFER, MATTHEW ANTHONY · 2012 to 2015
–
RRD VA I01 RX001334RRD VA IK1 RX000724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Touch perception on the fingers and hand is essential for fine motor control, contributes to our sense of self, allows for effective communication, and aids in our fundamental perception of the world. Despite increasingly sophisticated mechatronics, prosthetic devices still do not directly convey sensation back to their wearers. We show that implanted peripheral nerve interfaces in two human subjects with upper limb amputation provided stable, natural touch sensation in their hands for more than 1 year. Electrical stimulation using implanted peripheral nerve cuff electrodes that did not penetrate the nerve produced touch perceptions at many locations on the phantom hand with repeatable, stable responses in the two subjects for 16 and 24 months. Patterned stimulation intensity produced a sensation that the subjects described as natural and without "tingling," or paresthesia. Different patterns produced different types of sensory perception at the same location on the phantom hand. The two subjects reported tactile perceptions they described as natural tapping, constant pressure, light moving touch, and vibration. Changing average stimulation intensity controlled the size of the percept area; changing stimulation frequency controlled sensation strength. Artificial touch sensation improved the subjects' ability to control grasping strength of the prosthesis and enabled them to better manipulate delicate objects. Thus, electrical stimulation through peripheral nerve electrodes produced long-term sensory restoration after limb loss.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsTouch PerceptionAmputeesElectric StimulationElectrodes, ImplantedFeedback, SensoryHandHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor SkillsParesthesiaPeripheral NervesPhantom LimbPressureSensation

Identifiers

PMID25298320
PMCPMC5517305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.