ArticleThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2014
Patents and genome-wide DNA sequence analysis: is it safe to go into the human genome?
Article in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers to clinical adoption of next-generation sequencing: a policy Delphi panel's solutions.Personalized medicine · 2017Article
- Barriers to clinical adoption of next generation sequencing: Perspectives of a policy Delphi panel.Applied & translational genomics · 2016Article
- Persistent confusion and controversy surrounding gene patents.Nature biotechnology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Some claims in patents on individual genes and methods of detecting variations appear to be infringed by whole-genome and all-exome sequencing and genomic analysis. But what is the real risk of infringement liability? The risk is probably low. This is partly because it will rarely make sense to sue, but also because the patent-holder may well lose if they do sue. Courts have recently narrowed standards of patentable subject matter, invalidating broad method claims and DNA-based claims for sequences that would be found in nature. Moreover, claims broad enough to cover WGS are likely to be invalid on other grounds, and not worth risking a lawsuit to enforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.