ArticleBiomedical chromatography : BMC2015
Development and validation of a simple and isocratic reversed-phase HPLC method for the determination of rilpivirine from tablets, nanoparticles and HeLa cell lysates.
Article in Biomedical chromatography : BMC, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rilpivirine Ionic Liquid Nanoemulsion Augments the Oral Bioavailability of Rilpivirine and Its Delivery to the HIV Sanctuary Sites.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Virus-Mimicking Polymer Nanoparticles Targeting CD169ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2022Article
- Confocal fluorescence microscopy: An ultra-sensitive tool used to evaluate intracellular antiretroviral nano-drug delivery in HeLa cells.AIP advances · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the present investigation, a simple and isocratic HPLC-UV method was developed and validated for determination of rilpivirine (RPV) from dosage forms (tablets and nanoparticles) and biological matrices like HeLa cell lysates. The separation and analysis of RPV was carried out under isocratic conditions using (a) a Gemini reversed-phase C18 column (5 µm; 4.6 × 150 mm) maintained at 35°C, (b) a mobile phase consisting of a mixture of acetonitrile and 25 m m potassium dihydrogen phosphate (in the ratio 50:50 v/v) at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min and (c) atazanavir as an internal standard. The total run time was 17 min and the analysis of RPV and internal standard was carried out at 290 nm. The method was found to be linear (r(2) value > 0.998), specific, accurate and precise over the concentration range of 0.025-2 µg/mL. The lower limit of quantification was 0.025 µg/mL, the limit of detection was 0.008 µg/mL and the recovery of RPV was >90%. The stability of the RPV analytical method was confirmed at various conditions such as room temperature (24 h), -20°C (7 days), three freeze-thaw cycles and storage in an autosampler (4°C for 48 h). The method was successfully applied for the determination of RPV from conventional dosage forms like tablets, from polymeric nanoparticles and from biological matrices like HeLa cell lysates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.