Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25297934›Full record

ArticleHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2015

The inhomogeneous distribution of liver function: possible impact on the prediction of post-operative remnant liver function.

Henrik Nilsson, Silja Karlgren, Lennart Blomqvist, Eduard Jonas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henrik NilssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Silja Karlgren
Lennart Blomqvist
Eduard Jonas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies have shown that liver function is inhomogeneously distributed in diseased livers, and this uneven distribution cannot be compensated for if a global liver function test is used for the prediction of post-operative remnant liver function. Dynamic Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can assess segmental liver function, thus offering the possibility to overcome this problem.

methodsIn 10 patients with liver cirrhosis and 10 normal volunteers, the contribution of individual liver segments to total liver function and volume was calculated using dynamic Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Remnant liver function predictions using a segmental method and global assessment were compared for a simulated left hemihepatectomy. For the prediction based on segmental functional MRI assessment, the estimated function of the remnant liver segments was added.

resultsGlobal liver function assessment overestimated the remnant liver function in 9 out of 10 patients by as much as 9.3% [median -3.5% (-9.3-3.5%)]. In the normal volunteers there was a slight underestimation of remnant function in 9 out of 10 cases [median 1.07% (-0.7-2.5%)]. DISCUSSION: The present study underlines the necessity of a segmental liver function test able to compensate for the non-homogeneous nature of liver function, if the prediction of post-operative remnant liver function is to be improved.

Indexed as

AdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHepatectomyHumansLiverLiver CirrhosisLiver Function TestsLiver RegenerationMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SizePostoperative CarePredictive Value of TestsSampling Studies

Identifiers

PMID25297934
PMCPMC4333790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.