Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25297728›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2014

High-resolution digital profiling of the epigenome.

Gabriel E Zentner, Steven Henikoff

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Modern epigenetics methods in biological research.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gabriel E ZentnerBasic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
Steven Henikoff1] Basic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA. [2] Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.

Funding

Trans-NetworkU54CA143862 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MELDRUM, DEIRDRE R. · 2009 to 2013
$8.4M
Chromosome Metabolism and Cancer Training GrantT32CA009657 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI EISENMAN, ROBERT NEIL · 1991 to 2020
$7.6M
Epigenomic profiling of histone turnover kinetics in mammalian cellsR01ES020116 · NIEHS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HENIKOFF, STEVEN · 2010 to 2014
$2.4M
Genome-wide profiling of histone variants in Drosophila and CaenorhabditisU01HG004274 · NHGRI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HENIKOFF, STEVEN · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS T32 CA009657NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143862NHGRI NIH HHS 5U01 HG004274NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG004274NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widespread adoption of short-read DNA sequencing as a digital epigenomic readout platform has motivated the development of genome-wide tools that achieve base-pair resolution. New methods for footprinting and affinity purification of nucleosomes, RNA polymerases, chromatin remodellers and transcription factors have increased the resolution of epigenomic profiling by two orders of magnitude, leading to new insights into how the chromatin landscape affects gene regulation. These digital epigenomic tools have also been applied to directly profile both turnover kinetics and transcription in situ. In this Review, we describe how these new genome-wide tools allow interrogation of diverse aspects of the epigenome.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA FootprintingDNA MethylationEpigenomicsHumansNucleosomesTranscription, GeneticChromatinDNA-Binding ProteinsNucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID25297728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.