Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25297720›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2015

Artemether-lumefantrine co-administration with antiretrovirals: population pharmacokinetics and dosing implications.

Richard M Hoglund, Pauline Byakika-Kibwika, Mohammed Lamorde, Concepta Merry, Michael Ashton, Warunee Hanpithakpong, Nicholas P J Day, Nicholas J White, Angela Äbelö, Joel Tarning

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Richard M HoglundUnit for Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Pauline Byakika-Kibwika
Mohammed Lamorde
Concepta Merry
Michael Ashton
Warunee Hanpithakpong
Nicholas P J Day
Nicholas J White
Angela Äbelö
Joel Tarning
University of Gothenburg · SEMahidol University · THMakerere University · UGInfectious Diseases Institute · UGMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · THUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 093956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimDrug-drug interactions between antimalarial and antiretroviral drugs may influence antimalarial treatment outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential drug-drug interactions between the antimalarial drugs, lumefantrine, artemether and their respective metabolites desbutyl-lumefantrine and dihydroartemisinin, and the HIV drugs efavirenz, nevirapine and lopinavir/ritonavir.

methodData from two clinical studies, investigating the influence of the HIV drugs efavirenz, nevirapine and lopinavir/ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of the antimalarial drugs lumefantrine, artemether and their respective metabolites, in HIV infected patients were pooled and analyzed using a non-linear mixed effects modelling approach.

resultsEfavirenz and nevirapine significantly decreased the terminal exposure to lumefantrine (decrease of 69.9% and 25.2%, respectively) while lopinavir/ritonavir substantially increased the exposure (increase of 439%). All antiretroviral drugs decreased the total exposure to dihydroartemisinin (decrease of 71.7%, 41.3% and 59.7% for efavirenz, nevirapine and ritonavir/lopinavir, respectively). Simulations suggest that a substantially increased artemether-lumefantrine dose is required to achieve equivalent exposures when co-administered with efavirenz (250% increase) and nevirapine (75% increase). When co-administered with lopinavir/ritonavir it is unclear if the increased lumefantrine exposure compensates adequately for the reduced dihydroartemisinin exposure and thus whether dose adjustment is required.

conclusionThere are substantial drug interactions between artemether-lumefantrine and efavirenz, nevirapine and ritonavir/lopinavir. Given the readily saturable absorption of lumefantrine, the dose adjustments predicted to be necessary will need to be evaluated prospectively in malaria-HIV co-infected patients.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsAntimalarialsArtemisininsEthanolaminesFluorenesModels, BiologicalAdultAgedArtemetherBiological AvailabilityCross-Over StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsFemaleHumansLumefantrineAnti-HIV AgentsAntimalarialsArtemetherArtemisininsEthanolaminesFluorenesLumefantrineartemether-lumefantrinedrug-drug interactionefavirenzlopinavir/ritonavirnevirapinepopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID25297720
PMCPMC4386948
OpenAlexW1568989442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.