Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25297542›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2015

Differences between nurse practitioner and physician care providers on rates of secondary cancer screening and discussion of lifestyle changes among breast cancer survivors.

Tiffany C Kenison, Paula Silverman, Marla Sustin, Cheryl L Thompson

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The role of primary care Nurse Practitioners in reducing barriers to cervical cancer screening: A literature review.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2022
    Article
  6. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tiffany C KenisonDepartments of Family Medicine and Community Health, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Paula Silverman
Marla Sustin
Cheryl L Thompson
Case Western Reserve University · USUniversity Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBreast cancer survivorship care is provided by surgical and medical oncologists, primary care physicians (PCPs), and nurse practitioner survivorship specialists (NPs). The study objective was to identify whether frequency of cancer screening and discussion of healthy lifestyles differed across these provider types. We also determined differences by provider in survivor reported follow through with lifestyle recommendations.

methodsBreast cancer survivors completed surveys regarding the type of health-care provider they most recently saw, cancer screening, discussion, and self-reported lifestyle change since their breast cancer diagnosis.

resultsSeven hundred fifty-nine breast cancer survivors (78.7 % of those invited) completed the survey; 51.8 % indicated that their last visit was with a medical oncologist. There was no difference in rates of cancer screening (colon, cervical, and breast) among types of providers. A significantly larger proportion of patients who last saw an NP reported that they had discussed physical activity (78.6 %) as compared to medical oncologist 54.4 %, surgeon 43.1 %, radiation oncologist 64.1 %, and PCP 61.3 % (p < 0.001). Similar observations were observed for discussion of nutrition and weight (NP 70.0 %, medical oncologist 36.5 %, surgeon 25.7 %, radiation oncologist 48.7 %, PCP 35.5 %; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference across provider type in self-reported implementation of change in physical activity or diet.

conclusionsOur data indicate that a visit to the NP was related to comparable screening rates, but despite that NPs are more often discussing lifestyle modification, self-reported change in nutrition and physical exercise did not differ across provider type. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: NPs perform favorably with respect to lifestyle recommendations. Given the reported lack of lifestyle change, it is important to triage to providers who specialize in lifestyle modification and, if plausible, learn and provide actual evidence-based approaches to achieve positive outcomes in this area.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNurse PractitionersRisk Reduction BehaviorSurvivorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBehavior TherapyBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Second PrimaryNurse-Patient Relations

Identifiers

PMID25297542
OpenAlexW2054524096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.