Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25296974›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2014

Pilot study of p62 DNA vaccine in dogs with mammary tumors.

Vladimir Gabai, Franco M Venanzi, Elena Bagashova, Oksana Rud, Francesca Mariotti, Cecilia Vullo, Giuseppe Catone, Michael Y Sherman, Antonio Concetti, Andrey Chursov and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Vladimir GabaiCureLab Oncology Inc, Needham MA, USA.
Franco M VenanziSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine University of Camerino, Camerino (MC) Italy.
Elena BagashovaCenter of Modern Veterinary Medicine, Kiev, Ukraine.
Oksana RudCenter of Modern Veterinary Medicine, Kiev, Ukraine.
Francesca MariottiSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine University of Camerino, Camerino (MC) Italy.
Cecilia VulloSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine University of Camerino, Camerino (MC) Italy.
Giuseppe CatoneSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine University of Camerino, Camerino (MC) Italy.
Michael Y ShermanDepartment Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston MA, USA.
Antonio ConcettiSchool of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine University of Camerino, Camerino (MC) Italy.
Andrey ChursovCureLab Oncology Inc, Needham MA, USA.
Anastasia Latanova
Vita ShcherbininaCureLab Oncology Inc, Needham MA, USA. CL Oncology Moscow, Russia.
Victor ShifrinCureLab Oncology Inc, Needham MA, USA.
Alexander ShneiderCureLab Oncology Inc, Needham MA, USA. CL Oncology Moscow, Russia.
Università di Camerino · ITMoscow City Oncology Hospital №62 · RUBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our previous data demonstrated profound anti-tumor and anti-metastatic effects of p62 (sqstm1) DNA vaccine in rodents with various types of transplantable tumors. Testing anti-cancer medicine in dogs as an intermediary step of translational research program provides two major benefits. First, clinical data collected in target animals is required for FDA/USDA approval as a veterinary anti-cancer drug or vaccine. It is noteworthy that the veterinary community is in need of novel medicine for the prevention and treatment of canine and feline cancers. The second more important benefit of testing anti-cancer vaccines in dogs is that spontaneous tumors in dogs may provide invaluable information for human trials. Here, we evaluated the effect(s) of p62 DNA vaccine on mammary tumors of dogs. We found that p62 DNA vaccine administered i.m. decreased or stabilized growth of locally advanced lesions in absence of its overall toxic effects. The observed antitumor activity was associated with lymphocyte infiltration and tumor encapsulation via fibrotic reaction. This data justifies both human clinical trials and veterinary application of p62 DNA vaccine.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsCancer VaccinesDog DiseasesDogsFemaleHumansMaleMammary Neoplasms, AnimalPilot ProjectsSequestosome-1 ProteinToxicity TestsVaccines, DNAAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCancer VaccinesSequestosome-1 ProteinSQSTM1 protein, humanVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID25296974
PMCPMC4350343
OpenAlexW1522150319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.