Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25296935›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2014

A new methodology for assessing health policy and systems research and analysis capacity in African universities.

Gillian Lê, Tolib Mirzoev, Marsha Orgill, Ermin Erasmus, Uta Lehmann, Stephen Okeyo, Jane Goudge, Stephen Maluka, Benjamin Uzochukwu, Moses Aikins and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 12 institutions in 8 countries.

Gillian LêNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Institute for Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. g.dalgetty@leeds.ac.uk.
Tolib Mirzoev
Marsha Orgill
Ermin Erasmus
Uta Lehmann
Stephen Okeyo
Jane Goudge
Stephen Maluka
Benjamin Uzochukwu
Moses Aikins
Don de Savigny
Goran Tomson
Lucy Gilson
University of Cape Town · ZAGreat Lakes University of Kisumu · KEKarolinska Institutet · SELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBNuffield Health · GBSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversity of Dar es Salaam · TZUniversity of Ghana · GHUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Nigeria · NGUniversity of the Western Cape · ZAUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe importance of health policy and systems research and analysis (HPSR+A) has been increasingly recognised, but it is still unclear how most effectively to strengthen the capacity of the different organisations involved in this field. Universities are particularly crucial but the expansive literature on capacity development has little to offer the unique needs of HPSR+A activity within universities, and often overlooks the pivotal contribution of capacity assessments to capacity strengthening.

methodsThe Consortium for Health Policy and Systems Analysis in Africa 2011-2015 designed and implemented a new framework for capacity assessment for HPSR+A within universities. The methodology is reported in detail.

resultsOur reflections on developing and conducting the assessment generated four lessons for colleagues in the field. Notably, there are currently no published capacity assessment methodologies for HPSR+A that focus solely on universities - we report a first for the field to initiate the dialogue and exchange of experiences with others. Second, in HPSR+A, the unit of assessment can be a challenge, because HPSR+A groups within universities tend to overlap between academic departments and are embedded in different networks. Third, capacity assessment experience can itself be capacity strengthening, even when taking into account that doing such assessments require capacity.

conclusionsFrom our experience, we propose that future systematic assessments of HPSR+A capacity need to focus on both capacity assets and needs and assess capacity at individual, organisational, and systems levels, whilst taking into account the networked nature of HPSR+A activity. A genuine partnership process between evaluators and those participating in an assessment can improve the quality of assessment and uptake of results in capacity strengthening.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingDelivery of Health CareHealth PolicyHealth Services ResearchUniversitiesAfricaHumansResearchSystems Analysis

Identifiers

PMID25296935
PMCPMC4210597
OpenAlexW2101250492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.