Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25296886›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nutrition2015

Dietary sugars: their detection by the gut-brain axis and their peripheral and central effects in health and diseases.

Melissa Ochoa, Jean-Paul Lallès, Charles-Henri Malbert, David Val-Laillet

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nutrition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Communications biology · 2019
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Fructose and the Liver.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Sobriety and Satiety: Is NAD+ the Answer?Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Melissa OchoaINRA, UR1341 ADNC, Domaine de la Prise, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France.
Jean-Paul Lallès
Charles-Henri Malbert
David Val-Laillet
Physiologie Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstantial increases in dietary sugar intake together with the increasing prevalence of obesity worldwide, as well as the parallels found between sugar overconsumption and drug abuse, have motivated research on the adverse effects of sugars on health and eating behaviour. Given that the gut-brain axis depends on multiple interactions between peripheral and central signals, and because these signals are interdependent, it is crucial to have a holistic view about dietary sugar effects on health.

methodsRecent data on the effects of dietary sugars (i.e. sucrose, glucose, and fructose) at both peripheral and central levels and their interactions will be critically discussed in order to improve our understanding of the effects of sugars on health and diseases. This will contribute to the development of more efficient strategies for the prevention and treatment for obesity and associated co-morbidities.

resultsThis review highlights opposing effects of glucose and fructose on metabolism and eating behaviour. Peripheral glucose and fructose sensing may influence eating behaviour by sweet-tasting mechanisms in the mouth and gut, and by glucose-sensing mechanisms in the gut. Glucose may impact brain reward regions and eating behaviour directly by crossing the blood-brain barrier, and indirectly by peripheral neural input and by oral and intestinal sweet taste/sugar-sensing mechanisms, whereas those promoted by fructose orally ingested seem to rely only on these indirect mechanisms.

conclusionsGiven the discrepancies between studies regarding the metabolic effects of sugars, more studies using physiological experimental conditions and in animal models closer to humans are needed. Additional studies directly comparing the effects of sucrose, glucose, and fructose should be performed to elucidate possible differences between these sugars on the reward circuitry.

Indexed as

Appetite RegulationModels, BiologicalAnimalsBrainCentral Nervous SystemDietary SucroseEnteric Nervous SystemFructoseGastrointestinal TractGlucoseHumansHyperphagiaDietary SucroseFructoseGlucose

Identifiers

PMID25296886
PMCPMC4303703
OpenAlexW2140020251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.