ArticleCirculation. Heart failure2014
Calcium channel blockers and outcomes in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Article in Circulation. Heart failure, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between the beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, all-cause mortality and length of hospitalization in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Clinical cardiology · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety profile of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors in the management of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Heart failure reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Calcium Channel Blockade Versus β-Blockade for Hypertension in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Crossover Trial.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Trial
- Comparison of beta-blockersWorld journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based phenotyping and assessment of treatment responses in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Calcium channel blocker use and outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve intervention for aortic stenosis.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2025Observational
- Effects of calcium channel blockers in patients with heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2024Article
- Drug Therapy for Acute and Chronic Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction with Hypertension: A State-of-the-Art Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024Review
- Review
- Calcium channel blockers and clinical outcomes in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Article
- Association of Nondihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers Versus β-Adrenergic Receptor Blockers With Risk of Heart Failure Hospitalization.The American journal of cardiology · 2023Article
- Trends in pharmacotherapy utilization among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2023Article
- Current Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2022Article
- Amiodarone is associated with increased short-term mortality in elderly atrial fibrillation patients with preserved ejection fraction.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2022Article
- Managing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Review
- Management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Australian prescriber · 2020Review
- Calcium Channel Blockers Co-prescribed with Loop Diuretics: A Potential Marker of Poor Prescribing?Drugs & aging · 2020Review
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2020Review
- Targeting CaFrontiers in physiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLittle is known about associations of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) with outcomes in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (EF). METHODS AND
resultsOf the 10 570 hospitalized patients with heart failure and preserved EF, ≥65 years, EF ≥40%, in the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF; 2003-2004), linked to Medicare data (through December 31, 2008), 7514 had no prior history of CCB use. Of these, 815 (11%) patients received new discharge prescriptions for CCBs. Propensity scores for CCB initiation, calculated for each of the 7514 patients, were used to assemble a matched cohort of 1620 (810 pairs) patients (mean age, 80 years; mean EF, 56%; 65% women; 10% black) receiving and not receiving CCBs, balanced on 114 baseline characteristics. The primary composite end point of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization occurred in 82% and 81% of patients receiving and not receiving CCBs (hazard ratio for CCBs, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.14). Hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, and all-cause hospitalization were 1.05 (0.94-1.18), 1.05 (0.91-1.21), and 1.03 (0.93-1.14), respectively. Similar associations were observed when we categorized patients into those receiving amlodipine and nonamlodipine CCBs. Among 7514 prematch patients, multivariable-adjusted and propensity-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for primary composite end point were 1.03 (0.95-1.12) and 1.02 (0.94-1.11), respectively.
conclusionsIn hospitalized older patients with heart failure, new discharge prescriptions for CCBs had no associations with composite or individual end points of mortality or heart failure hospitalization, regardless of the class of CCBs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.