Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25296396›Full record

ReviewZoo biology

Nutrition and health in amphibian husbandry.

Gina M Ferrie, Vance C Alford, Jim Atkinson, Eric Baitchman, Diane Barber, William S Blaner, Graham Crawshaw, Andy Daneault, Ellen Dierenfeld, Mark Finke and 29 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zoo biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparing Nutrient Intake by Wolf Spiders (Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Insects as Feed for Companion and Exotic Pets: A Current Trend.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  12. Current Feeding Practice ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

Gina M FerrieAnimals, Science and Environment, Walt Disney World Resort, Lake Buena Vista, FL; Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.
Vance C Alford
Jim Atkinson
Eric Baitchman
Diane Barber
William S Blaner
Graham Crawshaw
Andy Daneault
Ellen Dierenfeld
Mark Finke
Greg Fleming
Ron Gagliardo
Eric A Hoffman
William Karasov
Kirk Klasing
Elizabeth Koutsos
Julia Lankton
Shana R Lavin
Andrew Lentini
Shannon Livingston
Brad Lock
Tom Mason
Alejandra McComb
Cheryl Morris
Allan P Pessier
Francisco Olea-Popelka
Tom Probst
Carlos Rodriguez
Kristine Schad
Kent Semmen
Jamie Sincage
M Andrew Stamper
Jason Steinmetz
Kathleen Sullivan
Scott Terrell
Nina Wertan
Catharine J Wheaton
Brad Wilson
Eduardo V Valdes

Funding

Postprandial Vitamin AR01DK068437 · NIDDK · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI BLANER, WILLIAM S · 2004 to 2023
$7.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK068437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amphibian biology is intricate, and there are many inter-related factors that need to be understood before establishing successful Conservation Breeding Programs (CBPs). Nutritional needs of amphibians are highly integrated with disease and their husbandry needs, and the diversity of developmental stages, natural habitats, and feeding strategies result in many different recommendations for proper care and feeding. This review identifies several areas where there is substantial room for improvement in maintaining healthy ex situ amphibian populations specifically in the areas of obtaining and utilizing natural history data for both amphibians and their dietary items, achieving more appropriate environmental parameters, understanding stress and hormone production, and promoting better physical and population health. Using a scientific or research framework to answer questions about disease, nutrition, husbandry, genetics, and endocrinology of ex situ amphibians will improve specialists' understanding of the needs of these species. In general, there is a lack of baseline data and comparative information for most basic aspects of amphibian biology as well as standardized laboratory approaches. Instituting a formalized research approach in multiple scientific disciplines will be beneficial not only to the management of current ex situ populations, but also in moving forward with future conservation and reintroduction projects. This overview of gaps in knowledge concerning ex situ amphibian care should serve as a foundation for much needed future research in these areas.

Indexed as

Animal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimals, ZooAmphibiansAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBone Diseases, MetabolicBreedingConservation of Natural ResourcesLife Cycle StagesStress, PhysiologicalVitamin A Deficiencyaquariumdiseaseex situhusbandrylife stagenutritionpathologypopulationresearchvitaminwaterzoo

Identifiers

PMID25296396
PMCPMC4685711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.