Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25296302›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

Combining AFM and acoustic probes to reveal changes in the elastic stiffness tensor of living cells.

Nadja Nijenhuis, Xuegen Zhao, Alex Carisey, Christoph Ballestrem, Brian Derby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Effects ofTissue engineering. Part A · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of PAK Inhibition on Cell Mechanics Depends on Rac1.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nadja NijenhuisSchool of Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Xuegen ZhaoSchool of Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Alex CariseyWellcome Trust Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Christoph BallestremWellcome Trust Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Brian DerbySchool of Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom. Electronic address: brian.derby@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G000336/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G004552/1Wellcome Trust 088785/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of how the elastic stiffness of a cell affects its communication with its environment is of fundamental importance for the understanding of tissue integrity in health and disease. For stiffness measurements, it has been customary to quote a single parameter quantity, e.g., Young's modulus, rather than the minimum of two terms of the stiffness tensor required by elasticity theory. In this study, we use two independent methods (acoustic microscopy and atomic force microscopy nanoindentation) to characterize the elastic properties of a cell and thus determine two independent elastic constants. This allows us to explore in detail how the mechanical properties of cells change in response to signaling pathways that are known to regulate the cell's cytoskeleton. In particular, we demonstrate that altering the tensioning of actin filaments in NIH3T3 cells has a strong influence on the cell's shear modulus but leaves its bulk modulus unchanged. In contrast, altering the polymerization state of actin filaments influences bulk and shear modulus in a similar manner. In addition, we can use the data to directly determine the Poisson ratio of a cell and show that in all cases studied, it is less than, but very close to, 0.5 in value.

Indexed as

AcousticsElastic ModulusMicroscopy, Atomic ForceActinsAnimalsCellsCell SurvivalMiceNIH 3T3 CellsProtein MultimerizationProtein Structure, QuaternaryShear StrengthActins

Identifiers

PMID25296302
PMCPMC4190602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.