Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25295732›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

REG4 independently predicts better prognosis in non-mucinous colorectal cancer.

Tuomas Kaprio, Jaana Hagström, Harri Mustonen, Selja Koskensalo, Leif C Andersson, Caj Haglund

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. REG4 promotes the proliferation and anti-apoptosis of cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Okamoto model for necrosis and its expansions, CD38-cyclic ADP-ribose signal system for intracellular CaProceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reg4+ deep crypt secretory cells function as epithelial niche for Lgr5+ stem cells in colon.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tuomas KaprioDepartment of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Research Programs Unit, Translational Cancer Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jaana HagströmResearch Programs Unit, Translational Cancer Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Pathology, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki and HUSLAB, Helsinki, Finland.
Harri MustonenDepartment of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Selja KoskensaloDepartment of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Leif C AnderssonDepartment of Pathology, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki and HUSLAB, Helsinki, Finland.
Caj HaglundDepartment of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Research Programs Unit, Translational Cancer Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Helsinki University Hospital · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionColorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the world's three most common cancers and its incidence is rising. To identify patients who benefit from adjuvant therapy requires novel biomarkers. The regenerating islet-derived gene (REG) 4 belongs to a group of small secretory proteins involved in cell proliferation and regeneration. Its up-regulated expression occurs in inflammatory bowel diseases also in gastrointestinal cancers. Reports on the association of REG4 expression with CRC prognosis have been mixed. Our aim was to investigate tumor REG4 expression in CRC patients and its coexpression with other intestinal markers.

methodsTumor expression of REG4 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 840 consecutive surgically treated CRC patients at Helsinki University Central Hospital. Expression of MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, synapthophysin, and chromogranin was evaluated in a subgroup of 220 consecutively operated CRC patients. REG4 expression with clinicopathological parameters, other intestinal markers, and the impact of REG4 expression on survival were assessed.

resultsREG4 expression associated with favorable clinicopathological parameters and with higher overall survival from non-mucinous CRC (p = 0.019). For such patients under 65, its expression was an independent marker of lower risk of death within 5 years that cancer; univariable hazard ratio (HR) = 0.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.34-0.94); multivariable HR = 0.55; 95% CI (0.33-0.92). In non-mucinous CRC, REG4 associated with positive MUC2, MUC4, and MUC5AC expression.

conclusionWe show, to our knowledge for the first time, that REG4 IHC expression to be an independent marker of favorable prognosis in non-mucinous CRC. Our results contradict those from studies based on quantification of REG4 mRNA levels, a discrepancy warranting further studies.

Indexed as

AgedBiomarkers, TumorChromograninsColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLectins, C-TypeLymphatic MetastasisMaleMucinsPancreatitis-Associated ProteinsPhenotypePrognosisSurvival AnalysisSynaptophysinBiomarkers, TumorChromograninsLectins, C-TypeMucinsPancreatitis-Associated ProteinsREG4 protein, humanSynaptophysin

Identifiers

PMID25295732
PMCPMC4190354
OpenAlexW2015547025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.