Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25295693›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2014

Gigaseal mechanics: creep of the gigaseal under the action of pressure, adhesion, and voltage.

Radomir I Slavchov, Takeshi Nomura, Boris Martinac, Masahiro Sokabe, Frederick Sachs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Biophysical Approaches for Applying and Measuring Biological Forces.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Asymmetric mechanosensitivity in a eukaryotic ion channel.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Radomir I SlavchovSofia University , Department of Physical Chemistry, 1 J. Bourchier Blvd., Sofia 1164, Bulgaria.
Takeshi Nomura
Boris Martinac
Masahiro Sokabe
Frederick Sachs
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPNagoya University · JPSofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" · BGSt Vincent's Clinic · AUUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patch clamping depends on a tight seal between the cell membrane and the glass of the pipet. Why does the seal have such high electric resistance? Why does the patch adhere so strongly to the glass? Even under the action of strong hydrostatic, adhesion, and electrical forces, it creeps at a very low velocity. To explore possible explanations, we examined two physical models for the structure of the seal zone and the adhesion forces and two respective mechanisms of patch creep and electric conductivity. There is saline between the membrane and glass in the seal, and the flow of this solution under hydrostatic pressure or electroosmosis should drag a patch. There is a second possibility: the lipid core of the membrane is liquid and should be able to flow, with the inner monolayer slipping over the outer one. Both mechanisms predict the creep velocity as a function of the properties of the seal and the membrane, the pipet geometry, and the driving force. These model predictions are compared with experimental data for azolectin liposomes with added cholesterol or proteins. It turns out that to obtain experimentally observed creep velocities, a simple viscous flow in the seal zone requires ~10 Pa·s viscosity; it is unclear what structure might provide that because that viscosity alone severely constrains the electric resistance of the gigaseal. Possibly, it is the fluid bilayer that allows the motion. The two models provide an estimate of the adhesion energy of the membrane to the glass and membrane's electric characteristics through the comparison between the velocities of pressure-, adhesion-, and voltage-driven creep.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneCholesterolElectric ConductivityElectric ImpedanceElectroosmosisEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGlassHydrostatic PressureIon ChannelsLiposomesMicroelectrodesPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhosphatidylcholinesRecombinant ProteinsSodium ChlorideasolectinCholesterolEscherichia coli ProteinsIon ChannelsLiposomesMscS protein, E coliPhosphatidylcholinesRecombinant ProteinsSodium Chloride

Identifiers

PMID25295693
PMCPMC4226309
OpenAlexW2332698567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.