Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25295253›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Optical coherence tomography guided laser cochleostomy: towards the accuracy on tens of micrometer scale.

Yaokun Zhang, Tom Pfeiffer, Marcel Weller, Wolfgang Wieser, Robert Huber, Jörg Raczkowsky, Jörg Schipper, Heinz Wörn, Thomas Klenzner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Towards OCT-Guided Endoscopic Laser Surgery-A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Spatio-temporal deep learning methods for motion estimation using 4D OCT image data.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yaokun ZhangInstitute for Anthropomatics and Robotics (IAR)-Intelligent Process Control and Robotics (IPR), KIT, Engler-Bunte-Ring 8, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7206-0916
Tom PfeifferLudwig-Maximilians-University, Oettingenstraße 67, 80538 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7791-1126
Marcel WellerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Moorenstraße 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Wolfgang WieserLudwig-Maximilians-University, Oettingenstraße 67, 80538 Munich, Germany.
Robert HuberInstitute for Biomedical Optics, University of Lübeck, Gebäude 81, Raum R 67, Peter-Monnik-Weg 4, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Jörg RaczkowskyInstitute for Anthropomatics and Robotics (IAR)-Intelligent Process Control and Robotics (IPR), KIT, Engler-Bunte-Ring 8, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Jörg SchipperDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Moorenstraße 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heinz WörnInstitute for Anthropomatics and Robotics (IAR)-Intelligent Process Control and Robotics (IPR), KIT, Engler-Bunte-Ring 8, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Thomas KlenznerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Düsseldorf University Hospital, Moorenstraße 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lasers have been proven to be precise tools for bone ablation. Applying no mechanical stress to the patient, they are potentially very suitable for microsurgery on fragile structures such as the inner ear. However, it remains challenging to control the laser-bone ablation without injuring embedded soft tissue. In this work, we demonstrate a closed-loop control of a short-pulsed CO2 laser to perform laser cochleostomy under the monitoring of an optical coherence tomography (OCT) system. A foresighted detection of the bone-endosteum-perilymph boundary several hundred micrometers before its exposure has been realized. Position and duration of the laser pulses are planned based on the residual bone thickness distribution. OCT itself is also used as a highly accurate tracking system for motion compensation between the target area and the optics. During ex vivo experimental evaluation on fresh porcine cochleae, the ablation process terminated automatically when the thickness of the residual tissue layer uniformly reached a predefined value. The shape of the resulting channel bottom converged to the natural curvature of the endosteal layer without injuring the critical structure. Preliminary measurements in OCT scans indicated that the mean absolute accuracy of the shape approximation was only around 20 μm.

Indexed as

AnimalsCochleaHumansLasers, GasLaser TherapySwineTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID25295253
PMCPMC4177734
OpenAlexW2170229522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.