Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25295249›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2014

Interaction analysis through proteomic phage display.

Gustav N Sundell, Ylva Ivarsson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Using Biological Networks to Guide Biomedical Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Heterologous expression of naturally evolved putative de novo proteins with chaperones.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Identifying New Substrates and Functions for an Old Enzyme: Calcineurin.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The carboxy-terminus, a key regulator of protein function.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gustav N SundellDepartment of Chemistry-BMC, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 576, 751 23 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-1355-6070
Ylva IvarssonDepartment of Chemistry-BMC, Uppsala University, P.O. Box 576, 751 23 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7081-3846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage display is a powerful technique for profiling specificities of peptide binding domains. The method is suited for the identification of high-affinity ligands with inhibitor potential when using highly diverse combinatorial peptide phage libraries. Such experiments further provide consensus motifs for genome-wide scanning of ligands of potential biological relevance. A complementary but considerably less explored approach is to display expression products of genomic DNA, cDNA, open reading frames (ORFs), or oligonucleotide libraries designed to encode defined regions of a target proteome on phage particles. One of the main applications of such proteomic libraries has been the elucidation of antibody epitopes. This review is focused on the use of proteomic phage display to uncover protein-protein interactions of potential relevance for cellular function. The method is particularly suited for the discovery of interactions between peptide binding domains and their targets. We discuss the largely unexplored potential of this method in the discovery of domain-motif interactions of potential biological relevance.

Indexed as

Peptide BiosynthesisPeptide LibraryProteomeBacteriophagesDNA, ComplementaryGene Expression RegulationHumansLigandsProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein Structure, TertiaryDNA, ComplementaryLigandsPeptide LibraryProteome

Identifiers

PMID25295249
PMCPMC4177731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.