Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25294321›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2014

Statistical measures of transcriptional diversity capture genomic heterogeneity of cancer.

Tingting Jiang, Weiwei Shi, René Natowicz, Sophia N Ononye, Vikram B Wali, Yuval Kluger, Lajos Pusztai, Christos Hatzis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Journal of Cancer · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. ERClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  14. First international TNBC conference meeting report.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tingting Jiang
Weiwei Shi
René Natowicz
Sophia N Ononye
Vikram B Wali
Yuval Kluger
Lajos Pusztai
Christos HatzisDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. christos.hatzis@yale.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMolecular heterogeneity of tumors suggests the presence of multiple different subclones that may limit response to targeted therapies and contribute to acquisition of drug resistance, but its quantification has remained challenging.

resultsWe performed simulations to evaluate statistical measures that best capture the molecular diversity within a group of tumors for either continuous (gene expression) or discrete (mutations, copy number alterations) molecular data. Dispersion based metrics in the principal component space best captured the underlying heterogeneity. To demonstrate utility of these measures, we characterized the diversity in transcriptional and genomic profiles of different breast tumor subtypes, and showed that basal-like or triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) are significantly more heterogeneous molecularly than other subtypes. Our analysis also suggests that transcriptional diversity is a global characteristic of the tumors observed across the majority of molecular pathways. Among basal-like tumors, those that were resistant to multi-agent chemotherapy showed greater transcriptional diversity compared to chemotherapy-sensitive tumors, suggesting that potentially multiple mechanisms may be contributing to chemotherapy resistance.

conclusionsWe proposed and validated measures of transcriptional and genomic diversity that can quantify the molecular diversity of tumors. We applied the new measures to genomic data from breast tumors and demonstrated that basal-like breast cancers are significantly more diverse than other breast cancers. The observation that chemo-resistant tumors are significantly more diverse molecularly than chemosensitive tumors implies that multiple resistance mechanisms may be active, thus limiting the sensitivity and accuracy of predictive markers of chemotherapy response.

Indexed as

Genes, NeoplasmAntineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDatabases, GeneticDNA Copy Number VariationsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm ProteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAntineoplastic AgentsNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25294321
PMCPMC4197225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.