ArticleBMC genomics2014
Statistical measures of transcriptional diversity capture genomic heterogeneity of cancer.
Article in BMC genomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel non-negative Bayesian stacking modeling method for Cancer survival prediction using high-dimensional omics data.BMC medical research methodology · 2024Article
- Intratumour heterogeneity, from hypothesis to the clinic.British journal of cancer · 2023Article
- Intratumor genetic heterogeneity and clonal evolution to decode endometrial cancer progression.Oncogene · 2022Article
- Metabolic Flexibility Is a Determinant of Breast Cancer Heterogeneity and Progression.Cancers · 2021Review
- Treatment scheduling effects on the evolution of drug resistance in heterogeneous cancer cell populations.NPJ breast cancer · 2021Article
- Article
- Intratumoural immune heterogeneity as a hallmark of tumour evolution and progression in hepatocellular carcinoma.Nature communications · 2021Observational
- Multi-Omics Investigation of Innate Navitoclax Resistance in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells.Cancers · 2020Article
- Age-related mutational signature negatively associated with immune activity and survival outcome in triple-negative breast cancer.Oncoimmunology · 2020Article
- Quantification of intrinsic subtype ambiguity in Luminal A breast cancer and its relationship to clinical outcomes.BMC cancer · 2019Article
- Review
- Reliability of Whole-Exome Sequencing for Assessing Intratumor Genetic Heterogeneity.Cell reports · 2018Article
- ERClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018Article
- First international TNBC conference meeting report.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2018Article
- SOX2 Promotes Cell Proliferation and Metastasis in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
- Metabolic profiling of triple-negative breast cancer cells reveals metabolic vulnerabilities.Cancer & metabolism · 2017Article
- Predictors of Chemosensitivity in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: An Integrated Genomic Analysis.PLoS medicine · 2016Article
- miR-34a Silences c-SRC to Attenuate Tumor Growth in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancer research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMolecular heterogeneity of tumors suggests the presence of multiple different subclones that may limit response to targeted therapies and contribute to acquisition of drug resistance, but its quantification has remained challenging.
resultsWe performed simulations to evaluate statistical measures that best capture the molecular diversity within a group of tumors for either continuous (gene expression) or discrete (mutations, copy number alterations) molecular data. Dispersion based metrics in the principal component space best captured the underlying heterogeneity. To demonstrate utility of these measures, we characterized the diversity in transcriptional and genomic profiles of different breast tumor subtypes, and showed that basal-like or triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) are significantly more heterogeneous molecularly than other subtypes. Our analysis also suggests that transcriptional diversity is a global characteristic of the tumors observed across the majority of molecular pathways. Among basal-like tumors, those that were resistant to multi-agent chemotherapy showed greater transcriptional diversity compared to chemotherapy-sensitive tumors, suggesting that potentially multiple mechanisms may be contributing to chemotherapy resistance.
conclusionsWe proposed and validated measures of transcriptional and genomic diversity that can quantify the molecular diversity of tumors. We applied the new measures to genomic data from breast tumors and demonstrated that basal-like breast cancers are significantly more diverse than other breast cancers. The observation that chemo-resistant tumors are significantly more diverse molecularly than chemosensitive tumors implies that multiple resistance mechanisms may be active, thus limiting the sensitivity and accuracy of predictive markers of chemotherapy response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.