Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25293675›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2015

Large-scale experience with an anchorless vascular closure device in a real-life clinical setting.

Verena Schelp, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Dieter Hinzmann, Peter Bramlage, Norbert Frey, Derk Frank

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Radial access protects from contrast media induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization procedures.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2018
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Verena SchelpDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel Schittenhelmstr. 12, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Sandra Freitag-Wolf
Dieter Hinzmann
Peter Bramlage
Norbert Frey
Derk Frank

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study was designed to evaluate safety and effectiveness of the vascular closure device Exoseal (Cordis) for hemostatic control following cardiac catheterization in a real-life clinical setting. METHODS AND

resultsThis prospective, single-center study enrolled n = 2,031 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography via the femoral artery ± PCI (n = 801). Patients were excluded if they had radial access, percutaneous repair of structural heart disease, or if they had severe peripheral artery disease. If clinical abnormalities were discovered at the access site, color Doppler ultrasound was performed. The composite primary endpoint was defined as bleeding/vascular complications and device failure, and it was experienced by 5.4 % (n = 110) of patients. The most frequent complications were pseudoaneurysm (2.9 %, n = 58) and access-site hematoma >6 cm (1.8 %, n = 37). The overall device failure rate was 0.7 % (n = 14). Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the strongest independent predictors of bleeding/vascular complications and/or device failure were procedure duration (OR 2.1, CI 1.4-3.2), PCI (OR 2.7, CI 1.7-4.2), GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (OR 2.9, CI 1.5-5.7), and age (OR 2.2, CI 1.4-3.5).

conclusionsThese results indicate that Exoseal was safe in a broad collective of patients. However, lengthy procedures, PCIs, the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and elderly patients require special attention.

Indexed as

AgedCardiac CatheterizationComorbidityCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleGermanyHematomaHemostasis, SurgicalHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPrevalenceProsthesis ImplantationRisk FactorsSuture Anchors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.